Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study

被引:75
|
作者
Leinhard, O. Dahlqvist [1 ,7 ]
Dahlstrom, N. [1 ,6 ,8 ]
Kihlberg, J. [1 ,6 ,8 ]
Sandstrom, P. [4 ,5 ]
Brismar, T. B. [2 ,3 ]
Smedby, O. [1 ,6 ,8 ]
Lundberg, P. [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat CMIV, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Div Med Imaging & Technol, Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Dept Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Div Surg & Clin Oncol, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Cty Council Ostergotland, Dept Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Linkoping Univ, Dept Radiol, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[7] Linkoping Univ, Dept Radiat Phys, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[8] UHL Cty Council Ostergotland, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; Gadobenate Dimeglumine; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Pharmacokinetics; Liver; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; ENHANCED MRI; NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS; SIGNAL INTENSITY; RELAXATION-TIMES; RAT LIVERS; QUANTIFICATION; PHASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-011-2302-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To develop and evaluate a procedure for quantifying the hepatocyte-specific uptake of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Methods Ten healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited and 21 patients with suspected hepatobiliary disease were retrospectively evaluated. All subjects were examined with DCE-MRI using 0.025 mmol/kg of Gd-EOB-DTPA. The healthy volunteers underwent an additional examination using 0.05 mmol/kg of Gd-BOPTA. The signal intensities (SI) of liver and spleen parenchyma were obtained from unenhanced and enhanced acquisitions. Using pharmacokinetic models of the liver and spleen, and an SI rescaling procedure, a hepatic uptake rate, K (Hep), estimate was derived. The K (Hep) values for Gd-EOB-DTPA were then studied in relation to those for Gd-BOPTA and to a clinical classification of the patient's hepatobiliary dysfunction. Results K (Hep) estimated using Gd-EOB-DTPA showed a significant Pearson correlation with K (Hep) estimated using Gd-BOPTA (r = 0.64; P < 0.05) in healthy subjects. Patients with impaired hepatobiliary function had significantly lower K (Hep) than patients with normal hepatobiliary function (K (Hep) = 0.09 +/- 0.05 min(-1) versus K (Hep) = 0.24 +/- 0.10 min(-1); P < 0.01). Conclusions A new procedure for quantifying the hepatocyte-specific uptake of T (1)-enhancing contrast agent was demonstrated and used to show that impaired hepatobiliary function severely influences the hepatic uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 653
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transitional phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: Visual assessment of hepatic function and fibrosis based on uptake rate of Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Inokuchi, Yasuhiro
    Fujikawa, Hiroshi
    Uematsu, Masahiro
    Takashina, Tsuneyuki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 156
  • [22] Experimental hepatic dysfunction: Evaluation by MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Kim, T
    Murakami, T
    Hasuike, Y
    Gotoh, M
    Kato, N
    Takahashi, M
    Miyazawa, T
    Narumi, Y
    Monden, M
    Nakamura, H
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (04): : 683 - 688
  • [23] The effects of three different contrast agents (Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DTPA, and Gd-DOTA) on brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Wang, Wensheng
    Liu, Tiefang
    Qi, Yeqing
    Ma, Lin
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [24] MRI OF THE LIVER WITH THE NEW CONTRAST-MEDIUM GD-BOPTA
    VOGL, TJ
    PEGIOS, W
    WAITZINGER, J
    PIROVANO, G
    BALZER, J
    LISSNER, J
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1992, 156 (05): : 465 - 470
  • [25] Gadoxetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced MRI versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-Enhanced MRI for Preoperatively Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma: an Initial Experience
    Park, Yulri
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kim, Seung Hoon
    Jeon, Yong Hwan
    Lee, Jongmee
    Kim, Min Ju
    Choi, Dongil
    Lee, Won Jae
    Kim, Heejung
    Koo, Ji Hyun
    Lim, Hyo Keun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 11 (04) : 433 - 440
  • [26] Pharmacokinetics of the liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA in relation to contrast-enhanced liver imaging in humans
    SchuhmannGiampieri, G
    Mahler, M
    Roll, G
    Maibauer, R
    Schmitz, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 37 (07): : 587 - 596
  • [27] Influence of Indocyanine Green on Hepatic Gd-EOB-DTPA Uptake A Proof-of-Concept Study in Mice
    Akai, Hiroyuki
    Yasaka, Koichiro
    Nojima, Masanori
    Inoue, Yusuke
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    Kiryu, Shigeru
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (07) : 441 - 445
  • [28] Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Stern, W
    Schick, F
    Kopp, AF
    Reimer, P
    Shamsi, K
    Claussen, CD
    Laniado, M
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2000, 41 (03) : 255 - 262
  • [29] COMPARISON OF GD-EOB-DTPA AND GD-DTPA FOR CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF LIVER-TUMORS
    CLEMENT, O
    MUHLER, A
    VEXLER, VS
    KUWATSURU, R
    BERTHEZENE, Y
    ROSENAU, W
    BRASCH, RC
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1993, 3 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [30] 肝脏特异性对比剂Gd-EOB-DTPA和Gd-BOPTA的肝摄取定量性差异初步研究
    O.D.Leinhard
    N.Dahlstrm
    J.Kihlberg
    P.Sandstrm
    T.B.Brismar
    .Smedby
    刘学焕
    国际医学放射学杂志, 2012, (03) : 294 - 294