Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study

被引:75
|
作者
Leinhard, O. Dahlqvist [1 ,7 ]
Dahlstrom, N. [1 ,6 ,8 ]
Kihlberg, J. [1 ,6 ,8 ]
Sandstrom, P. [4 ,5 ]
Brismar, T. B. [2 ,3 ]
Smedby, O. [1 ,6 ,8 ]
Lundberg, P. [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat CMIV, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol, Div Med Imaging & Technol, Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Dept Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Div Surg & Clin Oncol, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Cty Council Ostergotland, Dept Surg, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Linkoping Univ, Dept Radiol, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[7] Linkoping Univ, Dept Radiat Phys, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[8] UHL Cty Council Ostergotland, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; Gadobenate Dimeglumine; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Pharmacokinetics; Liver; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; ENHANCED MRI; NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS; SIGNAL INTENSITY; RELAXATION-TIMES; RAT LIVERS; QUANTIFICATION; PHASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-011-2302-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To develop and evaluate a procedure for quantifying the hepatocyte-specific uptake of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Methods Ten healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited and 21 patients with suspected hepatobiliary disease were retrospectively evaluated. All subjects were examined with DCE-MRI using 0.025 mmol/kg of Gd-EOB-DTPA. The healthy volunteers underwent an additional examination using 0.05 mmol/kg of Gd-BOPTA. The signal intensities (SI) of liver and spleen parenchyma were obtained from unenhanced and enhanced acquisitions. Using pharmacokinetic models of the liver and spleen, and an SI rescaling procedure, a hepatic uptake rate, K (Hep), estimate was derived. The K (Hep) values for Gd-EOB-DTPA were then studied in relation to those for Gd-BOPTA and to a clinical classification of the patient's hepatobiliary dysfunction. Results K (Hep) estimated using Gd-EOB-DTPA showed a significant Pearson correlation with K (Hep) estimated using Gd-BOPTA (r = 0.64; P < 0.05) in healthy subjects. Patients with impaired hepatobiliary function had significantly lower K (Hep) than patients with normal hepatobiliary function (K (Hep) = 0.09 +/- 0.05 min(-1) versus K (Hep) = 0.24 +/- 0.10 min(-1); P < 0.01). Conclusions A new procedure for quantifying the hepatocyte-specific uptake of T (1)-enhancing contrast agent was demonstrated and used to show that impaired hepatobiliary function severely influences the hepatic uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 653
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study
    O. Dahlqvist Leinhard
    N. Dahlström
    J. Kihlberg
    P. Sandström
    T. B. Brismar
    Ö. Smedby
    P. Lundberg
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 642 - 653
  • [2] Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents.: Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA
    Stroszczynski, C
    Gaffke, G
    Gnauck, M
    Streitparth, F
    Wieners, G
    Lopez-Häninnen, E
    RADIOLOGE, 2004, 44 (12): : 1185 - 1191
  • [3] Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA [Aktueller stand der MRT-diagnostik mit leberspezifischen kontrastmitteln: Gd-EOB-DTPA und Gd-BOPTA]
    Stroszczynski C.
    Gaffke G.
    Gnauck M.
    Streitparth F.
    Wieners G.
    Lopez-Häninnen E.
    Der Radiologe, 2004, 44 (12): : 1185 - 1191
  • [4] Liver Vessel Enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: A Comparison in Healthy Volunteers
    Brismar, T. B.
    Dahlstrom, N.
    Edsborg, N.
    Persson, A.
    Smedby, O.
    Albiin, N.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (07) : 709 - 715
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects
    Dahlstrom, N.
    Persson, A.
    Albiin, N.
    Smedby, O.
    Brismar, T. B.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (04) : 362 - 368
  • [6] A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Runge, VM
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (04) : 643 - 650
  • [7] Lesion detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings in abdominal MRI using hepatocyte specific contrast agents - comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA
    Ringe, Kristina I.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Husarik, Daniela B.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 13
  • [8] Lesion detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings in abdominal MRI using hepatocyte specific contrast agents – comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA
    Kristina I Ringe
    Daniel T Boll
    Daniela B Husarik
    Mustafa R Bashir
    Rajan T Gupta
    Elmar M Merkle
    BMC Medical Imaging, 13
  • [9] Comparison of Gd-Bz-TTDA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Gd-BOPTA for dynamic MR imaging of the liver in rat models
    Jaw, Twei-Shiun
    Chen, Shih-Hsien
    Wang, Yun-Ming
    Hsu, Jui-Sheng
    Kuo, Yu-Ting
    Chiu, Yen-Yu
    Tsai, Kun-Bow
    Hsieh, Tsyh-Jyi
    Liu, Gin-Chung
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 28 (03): : 130 - 137
  • [10] Comparison of the Enhancement Pattern of Hepatic Hemangioma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Performed With Gd-EOB-DTPA Versus Gd-BOPTA
    Vernuccio, Federica
    Bruno, Alberto
    Costanzo, Vincenzo
    Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo
    Vieni, Salvatore
    Midiri, Massimo
    Salvaggio, Giuseppe
    Brancatelli, Giuseppe
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (06) : 398 - 403