An integrated approach to evaluating assembly-line design alternatives with equipment selection

被引:16
|
作者
Ozdemir, Rifat Gurcan [1 ]
Ayag, Zeki [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Kultur Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn & Architecture, Atakoy Campus,D-100 Yanyol, TR-34156 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Kadir Has Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
assembly-line design; assembly-line balancing; branch and bound algorithm; multiple-criteria decision making; analytic hierarchy process; ANALYTIC-HIERARCHY-PROCESS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; BALANCING PROBLEM; DECISION-MAKING; SYSTEM; SOLVE;
D O I
10.1080/09537281003790515
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The design and implementation of assembly-line systems have been critical issues for companies since the first assembly-line was started at the Ford Highland Plant in 1913. From that time onwards, most companies have met with various problems at the design and implementation stages of assembly-line systems, two of which are the allocation of different work elements to various workstations and the proper equipment selection for workstations. Therefore, in this article, to overcome both the above-mentioned problems, we propose an integrated approach in which a branch and bound algorithm and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method are used together. First, the branch and bound algorithm is used to generate a list of assembly-line design alternatives. Then, the generated alternatives are evaluated using the AHP method to determine an optimum solution (the best alternative) at minimum equipment cost. The AHP method is one of the most commonly used multiple-criteria decision-making methods in the literature, and evaluates both qualitative and quantitative evaluation criteria represented in a hierarchical form. The proposed approach is also illustrated on a sample case study.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 206
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A management design approach to assembly line systems
    Yamada, T
    Matsui, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 84 (02) : 193 - 204
  • [42] Bi criteria flexible assembly line design problem with equipment decisions
    Pekin, N.
    Azizoglu, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (22) : 6323 - 6343
  • [43] Worker skills and equipment optimization in assembly line balancing by a genetic approach
    Mura, Michela Dalle
    Dini, Gino
    6TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON ASSEMBLY TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS (CATS), 2016, 44 : 102 - 107
  • [44] Modeling and evaluating design alternatives for an on-line instrumentation system: A case study
    Waheed, A
    Rover, DT
    Hollingsworth, JK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1998, 24 (06) : 451 - 470
  • [45] Evaluating inherently safer design alternatives using hazard conflict approach
    Rusli, R.
    Shariff, A. M.
    MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ECOLOGICAL HAZARDS III, 2012, 148 : 539 - 550
  • [46] An exact method for machining lines design with equipment selection and line balancing
    Battaia, Olga
    Dolgui, Alexandre
    Guschinsky, Nikolai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2024, 62 (1-2) : 71 - 91
  • [47] An integrated approach for product family and assembly system design
    De Lit, P
    Delchambre, A
    Henrioud, JM
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2003, 19 (02): : 324 - 334
  • [48] Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP
    V. Paramasivam
    V. Senthil
    N. Rajam Ramasamy
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 54 : 1233 - 1244
  • [49] Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP
    Paramasivam, V.
    Senthil, V.
    Ramasamy, N. Rajam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 54 (9-12): : 1233 - 1244
  • [50] An integrated design approach for evaluating the effectiveness and cost of a fleet
    D'Souza, Kiran
    Bayrak, Alparslan Emrah
    Kang, Namwoo
    Wang, Hui
    Altin, Berk
    Barton, Kira
    Hu, Jack
    Papalambros, Panos
    Epureanu, Bogdan I.
    Gerth, Richard
    JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2016, 13 (04): : 381 - 397