Intermediate clinical endpoints: A bridge between progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer trials

被引:62
|
作者
Matulonis, Ursula A. [1 ]
Oza, Amit M. [2 ]
Ho, Tony W. [3 ]
Ledermann, Jonathan A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] UCL, UCL Canc Inst, London, England
关键词
clinical trial; ovarian cancer; progression-free survival; surrogate endpoints; survival; PHASE-III TRIAL; OLAPARIB MAINTENANCE THERAPY; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA; CELL LUNG-CANCER; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; COLORECTAL-CANCER; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; EXPERT PANEL; COLON-CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.29082
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ovarian cancer patients are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, experience recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy, and eventually develop resistance to chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS), which has improved in recent years as more active treatments have been incorporated into patient care, is regarded as the most clinically relevant endpoint in ovarian cancer trials. However, although there remains a significant need for new treatments that prolong OS further without compromising quality of life, it has become increasingly difficult to detect an OS benefit for investigational treatments because of the use of multiple lines of chemotherapy to treat ovarian cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS), which measures the time to disease progression or death, is unaffected by postprogression therapies but does not evaluate the long-term impact of investigational treatments on tumor biology and responses to future therapies. Recent clinical trials of targeted agents in relapsed ovarian cancer have shown improvements in PFS but not OS, and this is possibly reflective of the long postprogression survival (PPS) period associated with this disease. Intermediate endpoints such as the time to second disease progression or death and the time to second subsequent therapy or death may provide supportive evidence for clinically meaningful PFS improvements and may be used to determine whether these improvements persist beyond the first disease progression and throughout subsequent lines of therapy. For clinical trials that have settings with a long PPS duration and/or involve multiple rounds of postprogression therapy, a primary endpoint of PFS supported by intermediate clinical endpoints and OS may provide a more comprehensive approach for evaluating efficacy. Cancer 2015;121:1737-1746. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. Overall survival is regarded as the most clinically relevant endpoint in trials of ovarian cancer, but it may be confounded by multiple lines of subsequent therapy. A primary endpoint of progression-free survival supported by intermediate clinical endpoints and overall survival provides a more comprehensive approach for evaluating efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1746
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND OVERALL SURVIVAL IN CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA
    Beauchemin, C.
    Johnston, J. B.
    Lapierre, M.
    Aissa, F.
    Lachaine, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 350 - 350
  • [42] Progression-free survival as a potential surrogate for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer
    Beauchemin, Catherine
    Cooper, Dan
    Lapierre, Marie-Eve
    Yelle, Louise
    Lachaine, Jean
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2014, 7 : 1101 - 1110
  • [43] Niraparib improves progression-free survival in ovarian cancer
    Gourd, Elizabeth
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (11): : E615 - E615
  • [44] Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival in ovarian cancer
    Mayor, Susan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2010, 71 (07) : 371 - 371
  • [45] Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Advanced/Recurrent Gastric Cancer Trials: A Meta-Analysis
    Paoletti, Xavier
    Oba, Koji
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Bleiberg, Harry
    Boku, Narikazu
    Bouche, Olivier
    Catalano, Paul
    Fuse, Nozomu
    Michiels, Stefan
    Moehler, Markus
    Morita, Satoshi
    Ohashi, Yasuo
    Ohtsu, Atsushi
    Roth, Arnaud
    Rougier, Philippe
    Sakamoto, Junichi
    Sargent, Daniel
    Sasako, Mitsuru
    Shitara, Kohei
    Thuss-Patience, Peter
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    Burzykowski, Tomasz
    Buyse, Marc
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (21): : 1667 - 1670
  • [46] Association Between Intermediate End Points, Progression-free Survival, and Overall Survival in First-line Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer
    Garside, Jamie
    Shen, Qin
    Westermayer, Bernd
    van de Ven, Michiel
    Kroep, Sonja
    Chirikov, Viktor
    Juhasz-Boess, Ingolf
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 45 (10) : 983 - 990
  • [47] Meta-analysis of the association between progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Chirila, Costel
    Odom, Dawn
    Devercelli, Giovanna
    Khan, Shahnaz
    Sherif, Bintu N.
    Kaye, James A.
    Molnar, Istvan
    Sherrill, Beth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (05) : 623 - 634
  • [48] Correlation of progression-free and post-progression survival with overall survival in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Shimokawa, M.
    Ohki, M.
    Kaku, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 36 (04) : 370 - 375
  • [49] CORRELATION OF PROGRESSION-FREE AND POST-PROGRESSION SURVIVAL WITH OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PHASE III TRIALS OF FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
    Shimokawa, M.
    Ohki, M.
    Kaku, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 393 - 393
  • [50] Correlation of progression-free and post-progression survival with overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer
    Petrelli, F.
    Barni, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (01) : 186 - 192