Repeatability of stature measurements in individuals with and without chronic low-back pain

被引:13
|
作者
Healey, EL [1 ]
Fowler, NE [1 ]
Burden, AM [1 ]
McEwan, IM [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Stoke On Trent ST7 2HL, Staffs, England
关键词
stadiometry; repeatability; chronic low-back pain;
D O I
10.1080/00140130500101221
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Measurements of reduction in stature have been used to compare spinal loading in chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and asymptomatic populations. Whether there are any differences in the repeatability of stature measurements, between those with and without CLBP, is not known. This investigation aimed to determine the repeatability of stature measurements in those with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) CLBP, and to establish if the ability to produce repeatable measurements is retained after a specific timeframe. Stature measurements were taken on two separate sessions that were 2 weeks apart, using a stadiometer accurate to 0.01 mm. All participants attained a mean SD of <= 0.5mm by the third measurement set taken on the first session of testing and no significant difference in mean SD was found between those with (0.37 mm) and without (0.40 mm) CLBP (p > 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) demonstrated good levels of repeatability for all stature measurements obtained from the participants and the values for Standard error of the measurement (SEM) improved as the mean SD decreased with each measurement set. Investigators should have confidence in the ability of those with and without CLBP to produce equally repeatable stature measurements with appropriate prior practice. The second session of testing demonstrated that both groups had retained the ability to achieve the desired level of repeatability (SD <= 0.5 mm) 2 weeks later without further practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1613 / 1622
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain
    van Middelkoop, Marienke
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Ostelo, Raymond W.
    Koes, Bart W.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02): : 193 - 204
  • [42] Comparison of pain intensity measurements among patients with low-back pain
    Nagy, Z.
    Kiss, N.
    Szigeti, M.
    Judit, Afraj
    Lekka, J.
    Misik, F.
    Mucsi, I
    Banczerowski, P.
    IDEGGYOGYASZATI SZEMLE-CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 77 (3-4): : 131 - 135
  • [43] Psychosocial subgroups, coping, and chronic low-back pain
    Carmody, TP
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2001, 8 (03) : 137 - 148
  • [44] EXPECTANCIES AND FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK PAIN
    COUNCIL, JR
    AHERN, DK
    FOLLICK, MJ
    KLINE, CL
    PAIN, 1988, 33 (03) : 323 - 331
  • [45] MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK PAIN - A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
    KRIEGLER, JS
    ASHENBERG, ZS
    SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 1987, 7 (04) : 303 - 312
  • [46] Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain
    Staal, J. Bart
    de Bie, Rob
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Hildebrandt, Jan
    Nelemans, Patty
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (03):
  • [47] Dropout from treatment for chronic low-back pain
    Richmond, RL
    Carmody, TP
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1999, 30 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [48] Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain
    Rubinstein, S. M.
    van Middelkoop, M.
    Assendelft, W. J. J.
    de Boer, M. R.
    van Tulder, M. W.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (02):
  • [49] Psychosocial Subgroups, Coping, and Chronic Low-Back Pain
    Timothy P. Carmody
    Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2001, 8 : 137 - 148
  • [50] Psychosocial risk factors in chronic low-back pain
    Guic, E
    Rebolledo, P
    Galilea, E
    Robles, I
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2002, 130 (12) : 1411 - 1418