Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein-peptide docking

被引:105
|
作者
Agrawal, Piyush [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Harinder [2 ]
Srivastava, Hemant Kumar [2 ]
Singh, Sandeep [2 ]
Kishore, Gaurav [2 ]
Raghava, Gajendra P. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indraprastha Inst Informat Technol, Ctr Computat Biol, Okhla Phase 3, New Delhi 110020, India
[2] CSIR Inst Microbial Technol, Sect 39A, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Protein-peptide docking; Benchmark; CAPRI; ZDOCK; FRODOCK; Hex; ATTRACT; PatchDock; pepATTRACT; WEB SERVER; BINDING-SITES; LIGAND DOCKING; PREDICTION; BLIND; ZDOCK; ALGORITHM; TOOL; OPTIMIZATION; REFINEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2449-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
BackgroundMolecular docking studies on protein-peptide interactions are a challenging and time-consuming task because peptides are generally more flexible than proteins and tend to adopt numerous conformations. There are several benchmarking studies on protein-protein, protein-ligand and nucleic acid-ligand docking interactions. However, a series of docking methods is not rigorously validated for protein-peptide complexes in the literature. Considering the importance and wide application of peptide docking, we describe benchmarking of 6 docking methods on 133 protein-peptide complexes having peptide length between 9 to 15 residues. The performance of docking methods was evaluated using CAPRI parameters like FNAT, I-RMSD, L-RMSD.ResultFirstly, we performed blind docking and evaluate the performance of the top docking pose of each method. It was observed that FRODOCK performed better than other methods with average L-RMSD of 12.46 angstrom. The performance of all methods improved significantly for their best docking pose and achieved highest average L-RMSD of 3.72 angstrom in case of FRODOCK. Similarly, we performed re-docking and evaluated the performance of the top and best docking pose of each method. We achieved the best performance in case of ZDOCK with average L-RMSD 8.60 angstrom and 2.88 angstrom for the top and best docking pose respectively. Methods were also evaluated on 40 protein-peptide complexes used in the previous benchmarking study, where peptide have length up to 5 residues. In case of best docking pose, we achieved the highest average L-RMSD of 4.45 angstrom and 2.09 angstrom for the blind docking using FRODOCK and re-docking using AutoDock Vina respectively.ConclusionThe study shows that FRODOCK performed best in case of blind docking and ZDOCK in case of re-docking. There is a need to improve the ranking of docking pose generated by different methods, as the present ranking scheme is not satisfactory. To facilitate the scientific community for calculating CAPRI parameters between native and docked complexes, we developed a web-based service named PPDbench (http://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/ppdbench/).
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMP 148-Benchmarking sets for molecular docking
    Irwin, John J.
    Huang, Niu
    Shoichet, Brian
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234
  • [42] Protein folding and peptide docking: A molecular modeling and global optimization approach
    Klepeis, JL
    Ierapetritou, MG
    Floudas, CA
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 22 : S3 - S10
  • [43] Structural mining: Self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential
    Liu, Zhijie
    Dominy, Brian N.
    Shakhnovich, Eugene I.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2004, 126 (27): : 8515 - 8528
  • [44] Structural mining: Self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential
    Liu, ZJ
    Dominy, BN
    Shakhnovich, EI
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 126 (27) : 8515 - 8528
  • [45] Prediction of GluN2B-CT1290-1310/DAPK1 Interaction by Protein-Peptide Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation
    Tu, Gao
    Fu, Tingting
    Yang, Fengyuan
    Yao, Lixia
    Xue, Weiwei
    Zhu, Feng
    MOLECULES, 2018, 23 (11):
  • [46] Molecular docking and global minimization methods
    Li, WJ
    PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2001, 28 (03) : 314 - 317
  • [47] Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking: Ensemble docking with GOLD
    Cole, Jason
    Groom, Colin
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 240
  • [48] Machine-learning methods for ligand-protein molecular docking
    Crampon, Kevin
    Giorkallos, Alexis
    Deldossi, Myrtille
    Baud, Stephanie
    Steffenel, Luiz Angelo
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2022, 27 (01) : 151 - 164
  • [49] Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking
    Huang, Sheng-You
    Zou, Xiaoqin
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 66 (02) : 399 - 421
  • [50] Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation
    Nakajima, N
    Higo, J
    Kidera, A
    Nakamura, H
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1997, 278 (4-6) : 297 - 301