Comparative pharmacokinetics of intravenous cephalexin in pregnant, lactating, and nonpregnant, nonlactating goats

被引:6
|
作者
Ambros, L. [1 ]
Kreil, V. [1 ]
Tarragona, L. [1 ]
Monfrinotti, A. [1 ]
Hallu, R. [1 ]
Rebuelto, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Ciencias Vet, RA-1053 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
DISPOSITION; KINETICS; EWES; FORMULATIONS; GENTAMICIN; DOSAGE; HORSE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01232.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to describe and compare the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of cephalexin (10 mg/kg) after its intravenous (i.v.) administration to five goats in three different physiological status: nonpregnant nonlactating (NPNL), pregnant (P) and nonpregnant lactating (L). Blood samples were collected at predetermined times, and plasma concentrations of cephalexin were measured by microbiological assay. Relevant pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Statistical comparison was performed applying the nonparametric ANOVA. No significant differences were found for cephalexin pharmacokinetic parameters between the L and the NPNL group. Median V-dss was significantly lower in pregnant goats (0.09 [0.07-0.10] L/kg) compared with NPNL goats (0.16 [0.14-0.49] L/kg). Median total Cl and V-dz were significantly lower in pregnant goats (0.25 [0.19-0.29] L/h.kg and 0.11 [0.10-0.13] L/kg, respectively) than in lactating goats (0.40 [0.32-0.57] L/h kg and 0.20 [0.14-0.23] L/kg, respectively). Median AUC(0-infinity) was significantly higher in pregnant goats (37.79 [34.75-52.10] mu g.h/mL) than in lactating goats (25.11 [17.44-31.14] mu g.h/mL). Our study showed that even though some pharmacokinetic parameters of cephalexin are altered in pregnant and lactating goats, these differences are unlikely to be of clinical importance; therefore, no dose adjustment would be necessary during pregnancy and lactation.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Omeprazole in Sheep and Goats
    Serih, Firas
    Fadel, Charbel
    Lebkowska-Wieruszewska, Beata
    Lisowski, Andrzej
    Poapolathep, Amnart
    Giorgi, Mario
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 48 (02) : 86 - 93
  • [22] Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in lactating goats
    El-Sooud, KA
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES A-PHYSIOLOGY PATHOLOGY CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1999, 46 (04): : 239 - 246
  • [23] Pharmacokinetics of tulathromycin in lactating goats
    Amer, A. M. M.
    Constable, P. D.
    Goudah, A.
    El Badawy, S. A.
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2012, 108 (1-3) : 137 - 143
  • [24] LACTOSE IN BLOOD IN NONPREGNANT, PREGNANT, AND LACTATING WOMEN
    ARTHUR, PG
    KENT, JC
    POTTER, JM
    HARTMANN, PE
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1991, 13 (03): : 254 - 259
  • [26] PHARMACOKINETICS OF FENOTEROL IN PREGNANT AND NONPREGNANT WOMEN
    HILDEBRANDT, R
    WEITZEL, H
    WARNKE, K
    GUNDERTREMY, U
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 45 (03) : 275 - 277
  • [27] HEXOPRENALINE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PREGNANT AND NONPREGNANT SHEEP
    LIPSHITZ, J
    YAU, MKT
    MEYER, MC
    AHOKAS, RA
    MADUSKA, AL
    WHYBREW, WD
    ANDERSON, GD
    MORRISON, JC
    SCHNEIDER, J
    RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS IN CHEMICAL PATHOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 34 (01): : 3 - 16
  • [28] METOCLOPRAMIDE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PREGNANT AND NONPREGNANT SHEEP
    RIGGS, KW
    AXELSON, JE
    GRUBER, NC
    MCERLANE, BA
    MCMORLAND, GH
    RURAK, DW
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1988, 77 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [29] Pharmacokinetics and milk penetration of moxifloxacin after intravenous and subcutaneous administration to lactating goats
    Fernandez-Varon, Emilio
    Villamayor, Lucia
    Escudero, Elisa
    Espuny, Alberto
    Carceles, Carlos M.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 172 (02): : 302 - 307
  • [30] PHARMACOKINETICS OF LIDOCAINE IN NONPREGNANT AND PREGNANT EWES
    SANTOS, AC
    PEDERSEN, H
    MORISHIMA, HO
    FINSTER, M
    ARTHUR, GR
    COVINO, BG
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (12): : 1154 - 1158