Does use of draft animal power increase economic efficiency of smallholder farms in Kenya?

被引:14
|
作者
Guthiga, P. M. [1 ]
Karugia, J. T. [2 ]
Nyikal, R. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, ZEF, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Nairobi, Dept Agr Econ, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
draft animal power; mechanization; smallholder farmers; profit function; economic efficiency;
D O I
10.1017/S174217050700186X
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Draft animal power (DAP) has been identified as an environmentally friendly technology that is based on renewable energy and encompasses integration of livestock and crop production systems. Draft animal technology provides farmers with a possibility to cheaply access and use manure from the draft animals and farm power needed to apply renewable practices for land intensification. Compared to motorized mechanization, DAP is viewed as an appropriate and affordable technology especially for small-scale farmers in developing countries who cannot afford the expensive fuel-powered tractor mechanization. However, it is apparent that there is no consensus among researchers on how it affects crop yields, profit and production efficiency when applied in farm operations. This study addressed the question of whether using DAP increases economic efficiency of smallholder maize producers in central Kenya. Results of the study are derived from a sample of 80 farmers, 57% of whom used draft animals while 43% used hand hoes in carrying farm operations. In the study area, draft animals are almost exclusively used for land preparation and planting, with very few farmers applying them in the consecutive operations such as weeding. A profit function was estimated to test the hypothesis of equal economic efficiency between 'DAP' and 'hoe' farms. The results showed that farmers who used DAP obtained higher yields and operated at a higher economic efficiency compared to those who used hand hoes. The analysis underscores the viability of DAP in increasing profitability of small-scale farms; however, other aspects of the technology, such as affordability of the whole DAP package, availability of appropriate implements and skills of using the technology, must be taken into account when promoting adoption of DAP technology.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Hind Quarter: Animal News You Can Use Draft Animal Power
    Bryant, Sheila
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & FOOD INFORMATION, 2010, 11 (04) : 360 - 366
  • [22] Fertiliser use efficiency, production risks and profitability of maize on smallholder farms in East Africa
    Kiwia, Abednego
    Kimani, David
    Harawa, Rebbie
    Jama, Bashir
    Sileshi, Gudeta W.
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2022, 58
  • [23] DOES COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH INCREASE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY?
    Samnaliev, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A5 - A5
  • [24] Use of draught animal power on small mixed farms in Asia
    Lawrence, PR
    Pearson, RA
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 71 (1-2) : 99 - 110
  • [25] Socio-economic and institutional factors underlying efficiency of smallholder vegetable farms in Southwest region of Cameroon
    Djoumessi, Yannick
    Afari-Sefa, Victor
    Kamdem, Cyrille Bergally
    Bidogeza, Jean-Claude
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 45 (01) : 93 - 106
  • [26] Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya
    Tittonell, P.
    Vanlauwe, B.
    Corbeels, M.
    Giller, K. E.
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2008, 313 (1-2) : 19 - 37
  • [27] A community education intervention to improve bovine trypanosomiasis knowledge and appropriate use of trypanocidal drugs on smallholder farms in Kenya
    Machila, Noreen
    Emongor, Rosemary
    Shaw, Alexandra P.
    Welburn, Susan C.
    McDermott, John
    Maudlin, Ian
    Eisler, Mark C.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 94 (02) : 261 - 272
  • [28] Yield gaps, nutrient use efficiencies and response to fertilisers by maize across heterogeneous smallholder farms of western Kenya
    P. Tittonell
    B. Vanlauwe
    M. Corbeels
    K. E. Giller
    Plant and Soil, 2008, 313 : 19 - 37
  • [29] TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DRAFT ANIMAL POWER FOR RICE PRODUCTION IN INDONESIAN VILLAGES
    ESPARON, NM
    DRAUGHT ANIMALS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 1989, 27 : 309 - 315
  • [30] PRICE EFFICIENCY OF DRAFT ANIMAL POWER FOR CULTIVATION OF THE SPRING RICE CROP IN BANGLADESH
    NEHRING, RF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1983, 65 (05) : 1186 - 1186