Use Genetic Programming for Selecting Predictor Variables and Modeling in Process Identification

被引:0
|
作者
Verma, Devendra [1 ]
Goel, Purva [1 ]
Patil-Shinde, Veena [1 ]
Tambe, Sanjeev S. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIR Natl Chem Lab, Chem Engn & Proc Dev Div, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
process identification; predictor variable; genetic programming; sensitivity analysis; dynamic model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Availability of an accurate and robust dynamic model is essential for implementing the model dependent process control. When first principles based modeling becomes difficult, tedious and/or costly, a dynamic model in the black-box form is obtained (process identification) by using the measured input-output process data. Such a dynamic model frequently contains a number of time delayed inputs and outputs as predictor variables. The determination of the specific predictor variables is usually done via a trial and error approach that requires an extensive computational effort. The computational intelligence (CI) based data-driven modeling technique, namely, genetic programming (GP) can search and optimize both the structure and parameters of a linear/nonlinear dynamic process model. It is also capable of choosing those predictor variables that significantly influence the model output. Thus usage of GP for process identification helps in avoiding the extensive time and efforts involved in the selection of the time delayed input-output variables. This advantageous GP feature has been illustrated in this study by conducting process identification of two chemical engineering systems. The results of the GP-based identification when compared with those obtained using the transfer function based identification clearly indicates the outperformance by the former method.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 237
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling traders' adaptation with genetic programming
    Chen, Shu-Heng
    Yeh, Chia-Hsuan
    International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Proceedings, KES, 2000, 2 : 725 - 728
  • [42] A Genetic Programming Environment for System Modeling
    Georgopoulos, Efstratios F.
    Zarogiannis, George P.
    Adamopoulos, Adam V.
    Vassilopoulos, Anastasios P.
    Likothanassis, Spiridon D.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THEORIES, MODELS AND APPLICATIONS, SETN 2008, 2008, 5138 : 85 - +
  • [43] IDENTIFICATION OF IMPORTANT PROCESS VARIABLES IN PRODUCTION
    DONOVAN, RG
    HAWTHORNE, SH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN LEATHER CHEMISTS ASSOCIATION, 1975, 70 (12): : 556 - 562
  • [44] System identification using Genetic Programming and Gene Expression Programming
    Flores, JJ
    Graff, M
    COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES - ISCIS 2005, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3733 : 503 - 511
  • [45] Use of conditional developmental operators and free variables in automatically synthesizing generalized circuits using genetic programming
    Koza, JR
    Yu, J
    Keane, MA
    Mydlowec, W
    SECOND NASA/DOD WORKSHOP ON EVOLVABLE HARDWARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 5 - 15
  • [46] Functional Programming for Business Process Modeling
    Saini, Abhishek
    Thiry, Laurent
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 10526 - 10531
  • [47] Nonlinear programming in process modeling and design
    Tortorelli, DA
    Michaleris, P
    JOM-JOURNAL OF THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY, 2003, 55 (03): : 46 - 54
  • [48] Nonlinear programming in process modeling and design
    Daniel A. Tortorelli
    Panagiotis Michaleris
    JOM, 2003, 55 : 46 - 54
  • [49] Identification of hydrologic drought triggers from hydroclimatic predictor variables
    Maity, Rajib
    Ramadas, Meenu
    Govindaraju, Rao S.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (07) : 4476 - 4492
  • [50] Fundamentals in Selecting Input and Output Variables for Composting Process Automatic Controllers
    Papadimitriou, Efstathios K.
    Bidlingmaier, Werner
    Gea, Teresa
    COMPOST SCIENCE & UTILIZATION, 2010, 18 (01) : 6 - 21