Watershed health assessment using the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework

被引:89
|
作者
Hazbavi, Zeinab [1 ]
Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza [2 ]
Gholamalifard, Mehdi [3 ]
Davudirad, Ali Akbar [4 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Watershed Management Sci & Engn, Fac Nat Resources, Tehran 4641776489, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Noor 4641776489, Mazandaran Prov, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Environm, Tehran 4641776489, Iran
[4] Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ctr Markazi Prov, Moghan 3818891138, Iran
关键词
ecosystem degradation; health determinants; healthy watershed; productive watershed; watershed behavioural health; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGICAL SECURITY; LAND; DEGRADATION; RELIABILITY; RESILIENCE; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; INDEX; LAKE;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.3420
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A pressure-state-response framework was customized to outline the watershed health (WH) concept. To achieve this, the watershed indicators of pressure, state (S), and response (R) were conceptualized according to 17 climatic, anthropogenic, and hydrologic criteria. Four node years of 1986, 1998, 2008, and 2014 were selected to provide a running picture of the Shazand Watershed condition. The WH index was then calculated using geometric mean of pressure, S, and R indicators and assigned a range of values varied from 0 (unhealthiest) to 1 (healthiest). (a) The main pressures on the Shazand Watershed come from climatic factors in 1998 and 2008 and human factors in all study years. (b) The climatic factor and then anthropogenic factors had the maximum effectiveness in explaining the S indicator. (c) In calculating R indicator, the anthropogenic factors in 1986 and the hydrologic factors in other study years played significant contributions. (d) The greatest percentage of the study area were assigned to moderate condition of S indicator in 1986, 1998, and 2008 with value of 42, 46, and 73%, respectively, whereas in 2014, 44 and 42% of the watershed were respectively recognized as relatively healthy and moderately healthy in terms of S indicator. (e) For the first to fourth study node years, some 53, 77, 78, and 60% of the Shazand Watershed had the relatively unhealthy condition, respectively. (f) The Shazand WH decreased about 12% during periods of 1986-1998 and 1986-2008. (g) An improving trend was also found in WH for some sub-watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 19
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Flood-oriented watershed health and ecological security conceptual modeling using pressure, state, and response (PSR) approach for the Sharghonj Watershed, South Khorasan Province, Iran
    Chamani, Reza
    Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza
    Zare, Somaye
    Shekohideh, Hengameh
    Mumzaei, Azam
    Amini, Hamed
    Hemmati, Laila
    Zarei, Reza
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2023,
  • [32] A multi-scale assessment of ecosystem health based on the Pressure-State-Response framework: a case in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China
    Wanxu Chen
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 29202 - 29219
  • [33] Flood-oriented watershed health and ecological security conceptual modeling using pressure, state, and response (PSR) approach for the Sharghonj Watershed, South Khorasan Province, Iran
    Chamani, Reza
    Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza
    Zare, Somaye
    Shekohideh, Hengameh
    Mumzaei, Azam
    Amini, Hamed
    Hemmati, Laila
    Zarei, Reza
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2024, 37 (01)
  • [34] A multi-scale assessment of ecosystem health based on the Pressure-State-Response framework: a case in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China
    Chen, Wanxu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (19) : 29202 - 29219
  • [35] Integrated Benefits of Sustainable Utilization of Construction and Demolition Waste in a Pressure-State-Response Framework
    Zhang, Han
    Shi, Shiying
    Zhao, Fangfang
    Hu, Mingming
    Fu, Xiao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [36] Assessment and forecasting of eco-environmental early-warning system for shale gas production in a pressure-state-response framework
    Sun, Jinfeng
    Zhu, Xiaoping
    Sun, Xiaoli
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2025, 47 (01) : 905 - 924
  • [37] Assessing Wetland ecosystem health in Sundarban Biosphere Reserve using pressure-state-response model and geospatial techniques
    Sahana, Mehebub
    Saini, Monika
    Areendran, Gopala
    Imdad, Kashif
    Sarma, Kiranmay
    Sajjad, Haroon
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 26
  • [38] Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework
    Wolfslehner, Bernhard
    Vacik, Harald
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [39] Measuring Urban Infrastructure Resilience via Pressure-State-Response Framework in Four Chinese Municipalities
    Chen, Min
    Jiang, Yu
    Wang, Endong
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Jun
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [40] Evaluation of ecological security and ecological maintenance based on pressure-state-response (PSR) model, case study: Fuzhou city, China
    Lai, Shuhui
    Sha, Jinming
    Eladawy, Ahmed
    Li, Xiaomei
    Wang, Jinliang
    Kurbanov, Eldar
    Lin, Zejing
    Wu, Longbin
    Han, Run
    Su, Yung-Chih
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2022, 28 (07): : 734 - 761