Watershed health assessment using the pressure-state-response (PSR) framework

被引:89
|
作者
Hazbavi, Zeinab [1 ]
Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza [2 ]
Gholamalifard, Mehdi [3 ]
Davudirad, Ali Akbar [4 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Watershed Management Sci & Engn, Fac Nat Resources, Tehran 4641776489, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Noor 4641776489, Mazandaran Prov, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Environm, Tehran 4641776489, Iran
[4] Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ctr Markazi Prov, Moghan 3818891138, Iran
关键词
ecosystem degradation; health determinants; healthy watershed; productive watershed; watershed behavioural health; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGICAL SECURITY; LAND; DEGRADATION; RELIABILITY; RESILIENCE; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; INDEX; LAKE;
D O I
10.1002/ldr.3420
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A pressure-state-response framework was customized to outline the watershed health (WH) concept. To achieve this, the watershed indicators of pressure, state (S), and response (R) were conceptualized according to 17 climatic, anthropogenic, and hydrologic criteria. Four node years of 1986, 1998, 2008, and 2014 were selected to provide a running picture of the Shazand Watershed condition. The WH index was then calculated using geometric mean of pressure, S, and R indicators and assigned a range of values varied from 0 (unhealthiest) to 1 (healthiest). (a) The main pressures on the Shazand Watershed come from climatic factors in 1998 and 2008 and human factors in all study years. (b) The climatic factor and then anthropogenic factors had the maximum effectiveness in explaining the S indicator. (c) In calculating R indicator, the anthropogenic factors in 1986 and the hydrologic factors in other study years played significant contributions. (d) The greatest percentage of the study area were assigned to moderate condition of S indicator in 1986, 1998, and 2008 with value of 42, 46, and 73%, respectively, whereas in 2014, 44 and 42% of the watershed were respectively recognized as relatively healthy and moderately healthy in terms of S indicator. (e) For the first to fourth study node years, some 53, 77, 78, and 60% of the Shazand Watershed had the relatively unhealthy condition, respectively. (f) The Shazand WH decreased about 12% during periods of 1986-1998 and 1986-2008. (g) An improving trend was also found in WH for some sub-watersheds.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 19
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatiotemporal ecosystem health assessment comparison under the pressure-state-response framework
    Boori, M. S.
    Choudhary, K.
    Paringer, R.
    Kupriyanov, A.
    COMPUTER OPTICS, 2022, 46 (04) : 634 - 642
  • [2] Ecosystem Health Assessment at County-Scale Using the Pressure-State-Response Framework on the Loess Plateau, China
    Liu, Delin
    Hao, Shilong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (01)
  • [3] Marine ecological and environmental health assessment using the pressure-state-response framework at different spatial scales, China
    Yang, Wei
    Zhang, Ziyue
    Sun, Tao
    Liu, Haifei
    Shao, Dongdong
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 121
  • [4] Assessment of mangrove health based on pressure-state-response framework in Guangxi Beibu Gulf, China
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhang, Li
    Chen, Bowei
    Deng, Liangchao
    Fu, Bolin
    Yan, Min
    Ji, Chengyun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 167
  • [5] Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)
    Das, Subhasis
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Shit, Pravat Kumar
    Alamri, Abdullah M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (15)
  • [6] PSR_ti model, an adapted pressure-state-response (PSR) framework for measuring tourism impacts: the case of Madrid
    Gomez-Bruna, Diana
    Martin-Duque, Clara
    Alzua-Sorzabal, Aurkene
    Ruiz-Rua, Aurora
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOURISM CITIES, 2023, 9 (03) : 693 - 711
  • [7] Ecological security assessment of China based on the Pressure-State-Response framework
    Zhang, Rui
    Wang, Chengli
    Xiong, Yachao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [8] Global sustainability assessment of cephalopod fisheries based on pressure-state-response framework
    Peng, Daomin
    Liu, Honghong
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Xu, Lu
    Jiang, Ruhao
    Zhu, Yugui
    Garcia-Lorenzo, Iria
    Chu, Jiansong
    Sumaila, U. Rashid
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (10)
  • [9] Measuring the agricultural sustainability of India: An application of Pressure-State-Response(PSR) model
    Surendra Singh JATAV
    Kalu NAIK
    RegionalSustainability, 2023, 4 (03) : 218 - 234
  • [10] Study on the Assessment Method of Agroecosystem Health Based on the Pressure-State-Response Model
    Li, B.
    Xie, H. L.
    Guo, H. H.
    Hou, Y.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2458 - +