Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years or younger

被引:41
|
作者
Samuelsen, Brian T. [1 ]
Wagner, Eric R. [1 ]
Houdek, Matthew T. [1 ]
Elhassan, Bassem T. [1 ]
Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin [1 ]
Cofield, Robert [1 ]
Sperling, John W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
reverse; shoulder; shoulder arthroplasty; young patients; survival; smoking; PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES; FOLLOW-UP; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS; CUFF; ARTHRITIS; 3-PART; OLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.026
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has classically been reserved for patients older than 65 years with rotator cuff arthropathy, pseudoparalysis, and severe pain. This investigation assessed outcomes in a consecutive series of patients aged 65 and younger undergoing primary RTSA. Methods: There were 63 patients (67 shoulders; 40 women, 27 men) with a mean age of 60 years (range, 50-65 years). Indications were cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) in 51, severe glenohumeral arthritis in 15, and osteonecrosis in 1. The primary end point was revision-free implant survival. Pain scale, motion, strength, and radiographic outcomes were also studied. Results: At a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years), the 2-year and 5-year revision-free survival was 99% and 91%, and reoperation-free survival was 97% and 90%, respectively. Complications occurred in 9%. Smoking increased the risk for revision, reoperation, and complications (P < .03). Patients experienced improvements in pain (P < .0001), active abduction (57.5 degrees vs. 132.4 degrees, P < .0001), and active external rotation (20.1 degrees vs. 39.4 degrees, P < .001). At the most recent follow-up, 90% patients were satisfied with their result, and 85% felt they were better or much better than before surgery. There was an 18% incidence notching, 3% incidence of dislocation, and no loosening. Conclusions: At both 2 and 5 years, RTSA is a reliable operation in patients aged younger than 65 years. Patients gain significant improvements in pain level, range of motion, and strength, without a large number of early failures. Long-term follow-up is needed to understand late component mechanical problems and loosening. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E13 / E17
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can a reverse shoulder arthroplasty be used to revise a failed primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty? REVISION REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY FOR FAILED REVERSE PROSTHESIS
    Wagner, E. R.
    Hevesi, M.
    Houdek, M. T.
    Cofield, R. H.
    Sperling, J. W.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (11): : 1493 - 1498
  • [22] Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients older than 80 years of age SURVIVAL AND OUTCOMES
    Clark, N. J.
    Samuelsen, B. T.
    Alentorn-Geli, E.
    Assenmacher, A. T.
    Cofield, R. H.
    Sperling, J. W.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (12): : 1520 - 1525
  • [23] Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty in Younger Patients
    Packer, Jonathan D.
    Blaine, Theodore A.
    PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2013, 41 (01): : 40 - 48
  • [24] Outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with morbid obesity
    Statz, Joseph M.
    Wagner, Eric R.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Cofield, Robert H.
    Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
    Elhassan, Bassem T.
    Sperling, John W.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (07) : E191 - E198
  • [25] Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe in patients aged ≥65 years? A comparison of readmissions and complications in inpatient and outpatient settings
    Willenbring, Taylor J.
    DeVos, Marijke J.
    Kozemchak, Adam M.
    Warth, Ryan J.
    Gregory, James M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (10) : 2306 - 2311
  • [26] Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid baseplate failure after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Holcomb, Jason O.
    Cuff, Derek
    Petersen, Steve A.
    Pupello, Derek R.
    Rankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (05) : 717 - 723
  • [27] Early Outcomes Following Metal-on-Metal Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years
    Riley, Clay
    Idoine, John
    Shishani, Yousef
    Gobezie, Reuben
    Edwards, Bradley
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (05) : E957 - E961
  • [28] Do younger patients have better results after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?
    Leathers, Michael P.
    Ialenti, Marc N.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Zhang, Alan L.
    Benjamin, C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : S24 - S28
  • [29] Primary shoulder reverse arthroplasty: Surgical technique
    Nerot, C.
    Ohl, X.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (01) : S181 - S190
  • [30] RESULTS OF PRIMARY AND REVISION REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
    Peretyaka, A. P.
    Maykov, S. V.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2012, (04): : 93 - 98