Slaughtering traits on Marchigiana beef cattle with and without muscle hypertrophy

被引:3
|
作者
Lasagna, E.
Landi, V.
Martuscelli, G.
Panella, F.
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Dipartimento Biol Vegetale & Biotecnol Agroambien, I-06121 Perugia, Italy
[2] Assoc Nazl Allevatori Bovini Italiani Carne, Perugia, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.147
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The hypertrophied Marchigiana is a recently studied genotype that can appear in this population both as homozygous and heterozygous; as a matter of fact it is caused by a single base mutation of the myostatin gene. The mutation is a G to T transversion at nucleotide 874 in exon 3, known as E291X. The homozygous one’s show some problems such a low viability, on the contrary heterozygous seem to have a very good performance in meat production. Usually the breeders don’t like very much homozygous hypertrophied genotype but they are attracted by the good conformation of the heterozygous. The aim of this study is to compare the performance on meat production of normal (no hypertrophied - N) versus heterozygous (E) calves in order to evaluate if there is some economic convenience in rearing the last one. The genotype identification was performed by a rapid PCR-RFLP test for the myostatin gene (AF320998) using genomic DNA purified from whole blood. The main growth and slaughtering traits were evaluated on 279 animals: 227 normal (186 males and 41 females), 52 heterozygous (47 males and 5 females). The data were processed according to a linear model concerning with the effects of genotype and sex. The net live weights are similar in the males (N: 614.63 vs. E: 614.47 Kg) but different (P=0.01) in the females (N: 447.83 vs. E: 464.40 Kg) because the heterozygous were slaughtered at an older age (N: 15.8 vs. E: 17.0 months). The daily gains are a bit higher in the normal calves, the differences between the two genotypes are more evident (P=0.05) when the live weight are considerated. The dressing percentage on live weight seem to be homogenous (close to 64%) except in the normal males (62.41%); but the more informative dressing percentages on net live weight show better performance (P=0.01) in the heterozygous both in the males (N: 68.85 vs. E: 71.25%) and in the females (N: 68.72 vs. E: 69.14%). All the bones measures (bones, fore and hind shanks, hool, head) are smaller (P=0.05) in the heterozygous showing proportionally a larger quantity of meat in this genotype. Also the entrails and the skin are smaller in the heterozygous; on the contrary in this genotype the tongue is larger confirming the macroglossy already detected in the hypertrophied Marchigiana mainly in the homozygous. The SEUROP evaluation allow to well appreciate the good performance of the heterozygous as a matter of fact these animals have a higher grade of numerically expressed conformation (E: 4.58 vs N: 4.42 in the males and E: 4.00 vs. N: 3.80 in the females) and a lower grade of fatness (E: 2.30 vs. N: 2.63 in the males and E: 2.80 vs. N: 2.98 in the females). The obtained results show that the heterozygous animals have good performances at slaughtering with good car-casses; at the same time doesn’t show the negative defects of the homozygous subjects. © Copyright 2007 Taylor & Francis Group LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 147
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Candidate genes for production traits in Nelore beef cattle
    Tizioto, P. C.
    Meirelles, S. L.
    Tulio, R. R.
    Rosa, A. N.
    Alencar, M. M.
    Medeiros, S. R.
    Siqueira, F.
    Feijo, G. L. D.
    Silva, L. O. C.
    Torres Junior, R. A. A.
    Regitano, L. C. A.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2012, 11 (04) : 4138 - 4144
  • [32] Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle
    Haskell, Marie J.
    Simm, Geoff
    Turner, Simon P.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2014, 5
  • [33] Genetic parameters of beef quality traits for Piemontese cattle
    Boukha, A.
    De Marchi, M.
    Albera, A.
    Bittante, G.
    Gallo, L.
    Carnier, P.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 6 : 53 - 55
  • [34] Principal components analysis for growth traits in beef cattle
    de Souza Dantas Muniz, Carolina Amalia
    de Queiroz, Sandra Aidar
    Mascioli, Arthur dos Santos
    Zadra, Lenira El Faro
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2014, 35 (03): : 1569 - 1576
  • [35] MATERNAL EFFECTS FOR GROWTH TRAITS IN BEEF-CATTLE
    WALDRON, DF
    MORRIS, CA
    BAKER, RL
    JOHNSON, DL
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (1-2): : 57 - 70
  • [36] RELATIONSHIP OF HEMOGLOBIN TYPES TO PRODUCTION TRAITS OF BEEF CATTLE
    PARKER, BA
    WESELI, DF
    CARTWRIG.TC
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1967, 26 (04) : 888 - &
  • [37] Tools for genetic improvement of maternal traits in beef cattle
    Coffey, M. P.
    Roughsedge, T.
    Simm, G.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2008, 16 : 1 - 4
  • [38] GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS AMONG TRAITS IN BEEF CATTLE
    CARTER, RC
    KINCAID, CM
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1957, 16 (04) : 1017 - 1017
  • [39] CALCULATION OF ECONOMIC WEIGHTS FOR BEEF PERFORMANCE TRAITS IN CATTLE
    WOLFOVA, M
    PRIBYL, J
    WOLF, J
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1992, 37 (6-7): : 539 - 545
  • [40] IDENTIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN BEEF-CATTLE
    BAHARIN, BK
    BEILHARZ, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1974, 40 (04): : 243 - 248