共 50 条
Asenapine for long-term treatment of bipolar disorder: A double-blind 40-week extension study
被引:81
|作者:
McIntyre, Roger S.
[1
]
Cohen, Miriam
[2
]
Zhao, Jun
[2
]
Alphs, Larry
[3
]
Macek, Thomas A.
[3
]
Panagides, John
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Mood Disorders Psychopharmacol Unit, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Merck, Summit, NJ USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
关键词:
Asenapine;
Bipolar disorder;
Mania;
Olanzapine;
Tolerability;
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RATING-SCALE;
ACUTE MANIA;
I DISORDER;
MAINTENANCE;
RISPERIDONE;
PREVALENCE;
OLANZAPINE;
DISABILITY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jad.2010.04.005
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Asenapine is approved in the United States for acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder with or without psychotic features. We report the results of long-term treatment with asenapine in patients with bipolar I disorder. Methods: Patients completing either of two 3-week efficacy trials and a subsequent 9-week double-blind extension were eligible for this 40-week double-blind extension. Patients in the 3-week trials were randomized to flexible-dose asenapine (5 or 10 mg BID), placebo, or olanzapine (5-20 mg QD; included for assay sensitivity only). Patients entering the extension phase maintained their preestablished treatment; those originally randomized to placebo received flexible-dose asenapine (placebo/asenapine). Safety and tolerability endpoints included adverse events (AEs), extrapyramidal symptoms, laboratory values, and anthropometric measures. Efficacy, a secondary assessment, was measured as change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score from 3-week trial baseline to week 52 with asenapine or olanzapine; the placebo/asenapine group was assessed for safety only. Results: Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was 71.9%, 86.1%, and 79.4% with placebo/asenapine, asenapine, and olanzapine, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were headache and somnolence with placebo/asenapine; insomnia, sedation, and depression with asenapine; and weight gain, somnolence, and sedation with olanzapine. Among observed cases, mean +/- SD changes in YMRS total score at week 52 were -28.6 +/- 8.1 and -28.2 +/- 6.8 for asenapine and olanzapine, respectively. Limitations: The study did not have a long-term placebo group. Conclusions: In this 52-week extension in patients with bipolar mania, asenapine was well tolerated and long-term maintenance of efficacy was supported. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 365
页数:8
相关论文