Frameworks and tools for risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials

被引:75
|
作者
Hristozov, Danail [1 ]
Gottardo, Stefania [2 ]
Semenzin, Elena [1 ]
Oomen, Agnes [3 ]
Bos, Peter [3 ]
Peijnenburg, Willie [3 ]
van Tongeren, Martie [4 ]
Nowack, Bernd [5 ]
Hunt, Neil [6 ]
Brunelli, Andrea [1 ]
Scott-Fordsmand, Janeck J. [7 ]
Tran, Lang [4 ]
Marcomini, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ca Foscari Venice, PST Vega Venezia, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Liberta 12, I-30175 Marghera, VE, Italy
[2] European Commiss Joint Res Ctr, Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, POB 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Inst Occupat Med, Ctr Human Exposure Sci, Res Ave North, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] EMPA Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol, Technol & Soc Lab, CH-9014 St Gallen, Switzerland
[6] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, REACH Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[7] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci Terr Ecol, Vejlsovej 25, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
Nanomaterials; Risk assessment; Frameworks; Tools; PREDICTING WATER SOLUBILITY; ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS; CARBON NANOTUBES; GRAPHENE NANOPLATELETS; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; AQUATIC EXPOSURE; SHORT-TERM; NANOPARTICLES; MODEL; OXIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2016.07.016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Commercialization of nanotechnologies entails a regulatory requirement for understanding their environmental, health and safety (EHS) risks. Today we face challenges to assess these risks, which emerge from uncertainties around the interactions of manufactured nanomaterials (MNs) with humans and the environment. In order to reduce these uncertainties, it is necessary to generate sound scientific data on hazard and exposure by means of relevant frameworks and tools. The development of such approaches to facilitate the risk assessment (RA) of MNs has become a dynamic area of research. The aim of this paper was to review and critically analyse these approaches against a set of relevant criteria. The analysis concluded that none of the reviewed frameworks were able to fulfill all evaluation criteria. Many of the existing modelling tools are designed to provide screening level assessments rather than to support regulatory RA and risk management Nevertheless, there is a tendency towards developing more quantitative, higher-tier models, capable of incorporating uncertainty into their analyses. There is also a trend towards developing validated experimental protocols for material identification and hazard testing, reproducible across laboratories. These tools could enable a shift from a costly case-by-case RA of MNs towards a targeted, flexible and efficient process, based on grouping and read-across strategies and compliant with the 3R (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principles. In order to facilitate this process, it is important to transform the current efforts on developing databases and computational models into creating an integrated data and tools infrastructure to support the risk assessment and management of MNs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 53
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: inventory modelling rules and application example
    Roland Hischier
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 941 - 943
  • [42] Life cycle assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: inventory modelling rules and application example
    Hischier, Roland
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (04): : 941 - 943
  • [43] TOOLS FOR SOCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Lomakin, V. V.
    SGEM 2015, BOOK 1: PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, SOCIOLOGY AND HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL. I, 2015, : 1061 - 1066
  • [44] DECISION FRAMEWORKS FOR CARCINOGENIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    BROWN, RN
    LORENTZEN, RJ
    BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (04) : 1117 - 1117
  • [45] NEW TOOLS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT
    Hogue, Cheryl
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2012, 90 (24) : 32 - 33
  • [46] Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation
    Isigonis, Panagiotis
    Hristozov, Danail
    Benighaus, Christina
    Giubilato, Elisa
    Grieger, Khara
    Pizzol, Lisa
    Semenzin, Elena
    Linkov, Igor
    Zabeo, Alex
    Marcomini, Antonio
    NANOMATERIALS, 2019, 9 (05)
  • [47] Risk assessment frameworks for nanomaterials: Scope, link to regulations, applicability, and outline for future directions in view of needed increase in efficiency
    Oomen, Agnes G.
    Steinhaeuser, Klaus Gunter
    Bleeker, Eric A. J.
    van Broekhuizen, Fleur
    Sips, Adrienne
    Dekkers, Susan
    Wijnhoven, Susan W. P.
    Sayre, Philip G.
    NANOIMPACT, 2018, 9 : 1 - 13
  • [48] Analyzing Risk Evaluation Frameworks and Risk Assessment Methods
    Radu, Raluca
    Sandescu, Cristian
    Grigorescu, Octavian
    Rughinis, Razvan
    2020 19TH ROEDUNET CONFERENCE: NETWORKING IN EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (ROEDUNET), 2020,
  • [49] Risk assessment approaches for nanomaterials in medical devices
    Landolfi, C.
    Labianca, M.
    Gazerro, C.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 399 : S375 - S375
  • [50] Development of a comprehensive risk assessment strategy for nanomaterials
    Thomas, KV
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (05) : S154 - S154