Comparison of four different backpacks intended for school use

被引:30
|
作者
Mackie, HW
Legg, SJ
Beadle, J
Hedderley, D
机构
[1] UNITEC, Sch Sport, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Massey Univ, Coll Business, Dept Human Resource Management, Ctr Ergon Occupat Safety & Hlth, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] Massey Univ, Dept Stat, Stat Res & Consulting Ctr, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
backpack; school; design; ergonomics;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00034-6
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Four backpacks were evaluated for their desireability for use as school bags. Three of the four backpacks were specifically designed for school use based on previous research and ergonomic principles while the fourth (standard) backpack was chosen from two backpacks that their manufacturer considered to be the most likely to be used as a school bag. Twelve school students evaluated each of the backpacks firstly by examining them, again after donning them and again after walking with them on a treadmill by completing a questionnaire asking about the appearance, function and comfort of each backpack. On initial examination, the standard backpack was the most favoured but as functionality became increasingly important during the treadmill walk, the backpack which was designed specifically for school use and had two major compartments, substantial back padding and side compression straps became the most favoured. This particular design of backpack was reported as having the greatest practicality, being the least physically demanding and allowing the greatest balance and ease of walking. The results of this study suggest that school student's preference of backpack may change from when they first examine a prospective backpack to when they have used it. The study also shows that school students' preferred attributes in a backpack may shift over this time from 'style and image' to 'function and fit'. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of selected perceptual variables for backpacks with internal and external frames
    Jacobson, B
    Jones, K
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2000, 90 (02) : 605 - 608
  • [32] Effects of different backpacks, weight and location on static and dynamic stability in children
    Talbott, NR
    Bhattacharya, A
    Davis, K
    Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Biomechanics, 2004, : 14 - 17
  • [33] DIFFERENT SETTINGS, DIFFERENT RESULTS - COMPARISON OF SCHOOL AND HOME RESPONSES
    ZANES, A
    MATSOUKAS, E
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1979, 43 (04) : 550 - 557
  • [34] What makes school backpacks a pain? - The pattern and determining factors of backpack loads
    Ruth, AR
    Gereige, RS
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 252A - 252A
  • [35] Effect of carrying school backpacks on cardio-respiratory changes in adolescent students
    Daneshmandi H.
    Rahmani-Nia F.
    Hosseini S.H.
    Sport Sciences for Health, 2008, 4 (1-2) : 7 - 14
  • [36] Comparison of different in vitro release methods used to investigate nanocarriers intended for dermal application
    Balzus, Benjamin
    Colombo, Miriam
    Sahle, Fitsum Feleke
    Zoubari, Gaith
    Staufenbiel, Sven
    Bodmeier, Roland
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2016, 513 (1-2) : 247 - 254
  • [37] Study on Comparison of Four Different Coatings onto Crystallizer
    Fu Wei
    Yong Yaowei
    Deng Qilin
    Fang Hongyuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINERY, MATERIALS ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (MMECEB), 2016, 49 : 477 - 482
  • [38] Comparison of four different measures of adherence in hemodialysis patients
    Rocco, M
    James, P
    Bradham, D
    Burkart, J
    Shumaker, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1996, 7 (09): : A0758 - A0758
  • [39] Comparison of the photochemical behavior of four different photoactivatable probes
    Weber, PJA
    BeckSickinger, AG
    JOURNAL OF PEPTIDE RESEARCH, 1997, 49 (05): : 375 - 383
  • [40] Comparison of Urinary Total Proteins by Four Different Methods
    Yalamati P.
    Karra M.L.
    Bhongir A.V.
    Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 2016, 31 (4) : 463 - 467