Mechanisms of Direct Radiation Damage to DNA: The Effect of Base Sequence on Base End Products

被引:28
|
作者
Sharma, Kiran K. K. [2 ]
Swarts, Steven G. [3 ]
Bernhard, William A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Biochem & Biophys, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] N Maharashtra Univ, Sch Chem Sci, Jalgaon 425001, Maharashtra, India
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B | 2011年 / 115卷 / 16期
关键词
ELECTRON-SPIN-RESONANCE; GAMMA-IRRADIATED DNA; FREE-RADICAL YIELDS; A-T POLYDEOXYNUCLEOTIDES; DIRECTLY IONIZED DNA; SINGLE-CRYSTALS; PLASMID DNA; PYRIMIDINE-BASES; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; STRAND BREAKS;
D O I
10.1021/jp200902h
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has been generally assumed that product formation in DNA damaged by ionizing radiation is relatively independent of base sequence, i.e., that the yield of a given product depends primarily on the chemical properties of each DNA constituent and not on its base sequence context. We examined this assumption by comparing direct-type end products produced in films of d(CTCTCGAGAG)(2) with those produced in films of d(GCACGCGTGC)(2). Here we report the product yields in d(CTCTCGAGAG)(2) hydrated to Gamma = 2.5 and 15, where Gamma is the hydration level given in moles of H(2)O/mole of nucleotide. Of the 17 products monitored by GC/MS, seven exhibited statistically significant yields: 8-oxoGua, 8-oxoAde, 5-OHMeUra, 5,6-diHUra, 5,6-diHThy, 5-OHCyt, and 5-OHUra. These yields at Gamma = 2.5 are compared with the yields from our previously reported study of d(GCACGCGTGC)(2) (after projecting the yields to a CG/AT ratio of 1). The ratio of projected yields, d(CTCTCGAGAG)(2) divided by d(GCACGCGTGC)(2), are 1.3 +/- 0.9, 1.8 +/- 0.3, 1.6 +/- 0.6, 11.4 +/- 4.7, 0.2 +/- 0.1, >28, and 0.8 +/- 1.1, respectively. Considering just d(CTCTCGAGAG)(2), the ratios of yields at Gamma = 2.5 divided by yields at Gamma = 15 are 0.7 +/- 0.2, 0.5 +/- 0.1, 2.3 +/- 4.0, 3.4 +/- 1.2, 3.5 +/- 3.3, 1.2 +/- 0.2, and 0.4 +/- 0.2, respectively. The effects of sequence and hydration on base product yields are explained by a working model emphasizing the difference between two distinctly different types of reaction: (i) radical reactions that progress to nonradical intermediates and product prior to dissolution and (ii) reactions that stem from radicals trapped in the solid state at room temperature that go onto yield nonradical product after sample dissolution. Based on these findings, insights into rates of hole and excess electron-transfer: relative to rites of proton transfer are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:4843 / 4855
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modelling the effect of structure and base sequence on DNA molecular electronics
    Ramos, M. M. D.
    Correia, H. M. G.
    NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 19 (37)
  • [22] Effect of base sequence and deprotonation of guanine cation radical in DNA
    Kobayashi, Kazuo
    Yamagami, Ryuhei
    Tagawa, Seiichi
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2008, 112 (34): : 10752 - 10757
  • [23] X-RAY-INDUCED BASE SEQUENCE DAMAGE IN PRIMATE ALPHOID DNA
    BASES, R
    MAIO, J
    MENDEZ, F
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1986, 105 (02) : 259 - 271
  • [24] Base sequence effects on transport in DNA
    Conwell, EM
    Bloch, SM
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2006, 110 (11): : 5801 - 5806
  • [25] THE BASE SEQUENCE DEPENDENCE OF DNA STIFFNESS
    LEGRANGE, JD
    AUSTIN, RH
    HOGAN, ME
    WANG, J
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 41 (02) : A289 - A289
  • [26] DNA base sequence complementary analyses
    Kuninaga, S
    RHIZOCTONIA SPECIES: TAXONOMY, MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, ECOLOGY, PATHOLOGY AND DISEASE CONTROL, 1996, : 73 - 80
  • [27] Base Sequence and the Architecture of Nucleosomal DNA
    Olson, Wilma K.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2009, 26 (06): : 916 - 916
  • [28] The sequence requirements for base J in DNA
    Borst, P.
    Van Luenen, H. G. A. M.
    Korlach, J.
    Baugh, L.
    Myler, P.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2015, 282 : 13 - 13
  • [29] Unzipping of DNA with correlated base sequence
    Allahverdyan, AE
    Gevorkian, ZS
    Hu, CK
    Wu, MC
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 69 (06): : 16
  • [30] Processing of oxidative DNA base damage
    Doublié, S
    Bandaru, V
    Wallace, SS
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U1830 - U1830