Who are the respondents of domestic violence protection orders?

被引:4
|
作者
Stewart, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Criminol & Criminal Justice, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1177/000486580003300106
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This study examined a sample of both male and female respondents of I applications for domestic violence protection orders in Queensland, Australia. The socio-demographic characteristics and criminal histories of respondents of only one domestic violence protection order (DVPO) application were compared with respondents of multiple DVPO applications. No differences were found between the groups in socio-economic background or ethnicity. The respondent's gender, marital status, and criminal history discriminated among respondents. Females were respondents on only one DVPO application. Respondents on cross applications were more likely to be married. Men who were respondents on multiple DVPO applications were more likely to have non-spousal violent criminal histories than men involved in only one protection order application. However, Indigenous people and people from disadvantaged areas were over-represented in the sample. These results of this study provide support for Johnson's (1995) concept of two distinct forms of couple violence. The implications of these findings for understanding the nature of domestic violence and managing violent offenders are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 90
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Firearm Removal, Judicial Decision-Making, and Domestic Violence Protection Orders
    Wallin, Mikaela
    Durfee, Alesha
    VIOLENCE AND GENDER, 2020, 7 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [22] Not a crime like any other: Sentencing breaches of domestic violence protection orders
    Douglas, Heather
    CRIMINAL LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 31 (04) : 220 - 233
  • [23] Firearm restrictions in domestic violence protection orders: Implementation, vetting, compliance, and enforcement
    Ellyson, Alice M.
    Adhia, Avanti
    Shanahan, Sandra
    Alsinai, Aisha
    DiMscolo, Lisa
    Reygers, Maxmilliaan
    Bowen, Deirdre
    Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
    CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 23 (04) : 803 - 832
  • [24] Abuse history in a cohort of domestic violence victims with and without protection orders.
    Wolf, ME
    Kernic, MA
    Holt, VL
    Rivara, FP
    Levy, MR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 149 (11) : S15 - S15
  • [25] Criminal Protection Orders for Women Victims of Domestic Violence: Explicating Predictors of Level of Restrictions Among Orders Issued
    Sullivan, Tami P.
    Weiss, Nicole H.
    Price, Carolina
    Pugh, Nicole E.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (1-2) : NP643 - NP662
  • [26] A Comparison of Civil and Criminal Orders of Protection as Remedies for Domestic Violence Victims in a Midwestern County
    Kethineni, Sesha
    Beichner, Dawn
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2009, 24 (05) : 311 - 321
  • [27] A Comparison of Civil and Criminal Orders of Protection as Remedies for Domestic Violence Victims in a Midwestern County
    Sesha Kethineni
    Dawn Beichner
    Journal of Family Violence, 2009, 24 : 311 - 321
  • [28] No longer a civil matter? The design and use of protection orders for domestic violence in England and Wales
    Bates, Lis
    Hester, Marianne
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2020, 42 (02) : 133 - 153
  • [29] Criminal Protection Orders: Implications of Requested Versus Issued Orders on Domestic Violence Revictimiztion and Mental Health Among Women
    Sullivan, Tami P.
    Weiss, Nicole H.
    Woerner, Jacqueline
    Belliveau, Diana
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2022, 37 (19-20) : NP18445 - NP18464
  • [30] The Effectiveness of Protection Orders in Reducing Recidivism in Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cordier, Reinie
    Chung, Donna
    Wilkes-Gillan, Sarah
    Speyer, Renee
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2021, 22 (04) : 804 - 828