Does baseline [18F] FDG-PET/CT correlate with tumor staging, response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and prognosis in patients with rectal cancer?

被引:17
|
作者
Deantonio, Letizia [1 ,2 ]
Caroli, Angela [1 ]
Puta, Erinda [3 ]
Ferrante, Daniela [4 ,5 ]
Apicella, Francesco [1 ]
Turri, Lucia [1 ]
Sacchetti, Gianmauro [3 ]
Brambilla, Marco [6 ]
Krengli, Marco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Maggiore della Carita, Radiotherapy, Novara, Italy
[2] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Dept Translat Med, Novara, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Maggiore della Carita, Nucl Med, Novara, Italy
[4] CPO Piemonte, Dept Translat Med, Unit Med Stat & Canc Epidemiol, Novara, Italy
[5] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp Maggiore della Carita, Med Phys, Novara, Italy
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 13卷
关键词
Rectal cancer; 18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; Standardized uptake value; Metabolic tumor volume; Total lesion glycolysis; Predictive value; TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; F-18-FDG PET/CT; LOCAL RECURRENCE; EARLY PREDICTION; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-018-1154-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F] FDG-PET/CT) may be used for tumor staging and prognosis in several tumors but its role in rectal cancer is still debated. The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation of baseline [18F] FDG-PET parameters with tumor staging, tumor response (tumor regression grade (TRG)), and outcome in a series of patients affected by locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: One hundred patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and radical surgery were enrolled in the present study. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) at the baseline [18F] FDG-PET were calculated. These PET parameters were correlated with tumor staging, histopathological data (TRG1 vs. TRG2-5 and TRG1-2 vs. TRG3-5), disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results: SUVmax and SUVmean of primary tumor were statistically associated with T4-stage. SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG did not result statistically associated with TRG (TRG1 or TRG1-2). MTV resulted statistically associated with TRG1-2 group (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.2-7.1). Finally, no PET parameter was significantly associated with disease-free or overall survival. Conclusion: Our results showed that baseline [18F] FDG-PET parameters correlated with tumor staging, and only MTV correlated with TRG 1-2. PET parameters failed to predict disease-free and overall survival after treatment completion. The results leave open to further studies the issue of identifying patients suitable for conservative approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FDG-PET Assessment of Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Is Not Associated With Long-Term Prognosis: A Prospective Evaluation
    Ruby, Jeannine A.
    Leibold, Tobias
    Akhurst, Timothy J.
    Shia, Jinru
    Saltz, Leonard B.
    Mazumdar, Madhu
    Riedel, Elyn R.
    Larson, Steven M.
    Guillem, Jose G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2012, 55 (04) : 378 - 386
  • [42] The predictive value of MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for assessing pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Avci, G. Guler
    Aral, I.
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2019, 85 : S35 - S35
  • [43] Assessment of response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with F-18 FLT and F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with rectal cancer
    Rendl, Gundula
    Rettenbacher, Lukas
    Holzmannhofer, Johannes
    Datz, Lidwina
    Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia
    Fastner, Gerd
    Oefner, Dietmar
    Sedlmayer, Felix
    Pirich, Christian
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (03) : 284 - 294
  • [44] Assessment of response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with F-18 FLT and F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with rectal cancer
    Gundula Rendl
    Lukas Rettenbacher
    Johannes Holzmannhofer
    Lidwina Datz
    Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger
    Gerd Fastner
    Dietmar Öfner
    Felix Sedlmayer
    Christian Pirich
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2015, 29 : 284 - 294
  • [45] [18F]FDG PET-CT in staging, re staging and assessment of breast cancer response in men
    Ruiz, L. Cagua
    Luquin, T. Aroui
    Navas, D. Rivas
    Donis, A. Pinero
    Sanchez, R. Sanchez
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 : S481 - S481
  • [46] Ensemble Methods with [18F]FDG-PET/CT Radiomics in Breast Cancer Response Prediction
    Dholey, Moumita
    Santosham, Ritesh J. M.
    Ray, Soumendranath
    Das, Jayanta
    Chatterjee, Sanjoy
    Ahmed, Rosina
    Mukherjee, Jayanta
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, PREMI 2023, 2023, 14301 : 369 - 379
  • [47] Impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating the response to neadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Pedraza Fernandez, S.
    Perez-Escutia, M.
    Sanchez-Fuentes, D.
    Nenclares, P.
    Ruiz-Solis, S.
    Pena, M.
    Lora, D.
    Perez-Regadera, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S609 - S609
  • [48] Tumor SUVmax Normalized to Liver Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT Predicts the Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Park J.
    Chang K.J.
    Seo Y.S.
    Byun B.H.
    Choi J.H.
    Moon H.
    Lim I.
    Kim B.I.
    Choi C.W.
    Lim S.M.
    Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014, 48 (4) : 295 - 302
  • [49] Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer
    Kenjiro Aogi
    Takayuki Kadoya
    Yoshifumi Sugawara
    Sachiko Kiyoto
    Hideo Shigematsu
    Norio Masumoto
    Morihito Okada
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 150 : 209 - 217
  • [50] Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer
    Aogi, Kenjiro
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Sugawara, Yoshifumi
    Kiyoto, Sachiko
    Shigematsu, Hideo
    Masumoto, Norio
    Okada, Morihito
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 150 (01) : 209 - 217