Effects of Kocide 101® on the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.) -: Rhizobium symbiosis

被引:5
|
作者
Baijukya, FP
Semu, E
机构
[1] Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Morogoro, Tanzania
[2] Maruku Agr Res Inst, Bukoba, Tanzania
关键词
beans; Kocide; 101; nitrogen fixation; nodulation; rhizobia; symbiosis;
D O I
10.1080/09064719809362496
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A glasshouse study was undertaken to investigate the effects of the copper fungicide Kocide 101 and its residues in soil on the growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). The soil used was a sandy clay loam classified as Typic Rhodustalf. The bean variety SUA 90 was used as test crop. The bean rhizobia strains CIAT 899, PV1 and a local isolate were used. Kocide 101 applied at the recommended rate (equivalent to 1.7 mg kg(-1) soil) had no significant negative effects on the growth, nodulation or nitrogen fixation of bean plants. Higher levels of Kocide 101 significantly (P < 0.05) reduced plant growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation. The bean plants inoculated with the "local isolate" rhizobia had the highest dry matter weights, nodule numbers and nodule dry weights, and also had more N fixation. They were followed by those inoculated with the PV1 strain and, lastly, those inoculated with CIAT 899. The growth and nodulation of bean plants were still curtailed by the Kocide 101 residues four months after the fungicide was first applied to the soil. Therefore, occurrence of high levels of Kocide 101 in soils can have long-term effects on the performance of the bean-rhizobia symbiosis.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Growth stimulation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by Trichoderma
    Hoyos-Carvajal, Liliana
    Orduz, Sergio
    Bissett, John
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2009, 51 (03) : 409 - 416
  • [22] The polyphenolic profiles of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Harnly, James M.
    Lin, Long-Ze
    Pastor-Corrales, Marcial S.
    Luthria, Devanand L.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2007, 21 (05): : A316 - A316
  • [23] The polyphenolic profiles of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Lin, Long-Ze
    Harnly, James M.
    Pastor-Corrales, Marcial S.
    Luthria, Devanand L.
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2008, 107 (01) : 399 - 410
  • [24] Is it worth inoculating common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)?
    Kellman, Anthony W.
    Hill, George D.
    McKenzie, Bruce A.
    AGRONOMY NEW ZEALAND, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 36 : 24 - +
  • [25] Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Kelly, JD
    Judith, MK
    Schneider, K
    EUPHYTICA, 1998, 102 (03) : 343 - 356
  • [26] Breeding for yield in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    James D. Kelly
    Judith M. Kolkman
    Kristin Schneider
    Euphytica, 1998, 102 : 343 - 356
  • [27] Effects of Rhizobium tropici azide-resistant mutants on growth, nitrogen nutrition and nodulation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Fiori, Amanda Karoline
    Gutuzzo, Giovana de Oliveira
    dos Santos Sanzovo, Alisson Wilson
    Andrade, Diva de Souza
    Martinez de Oliveira, Andre Luiz
    Rodrigues, Elisete Pains
    RHIZOSPHERE, 2021, 18
  • [28] Effects of traditional processing of haricot bean (phaseolus vulgaris L.) on Nutritional composition
    Fekadulemessa
    Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2004, 41 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [29] Ameliorative Effects of Biochar for Cadmium Stress on Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Growth
    Dadasoglu, Esin
    Ekinci, Melek
    Turan, Metin
    Yildirim, Ertan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [30] Salinity effects on plant tissue culture of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Dölek, B
    Bajrovic, K
    Gözükirmizi, N
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2001, 15 (02) : 97 - 100