Bioconversion of high-concentration chelatedCdtonano-CdSphotocatalyst by sulfate-reducing bacteria

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Yali [1 ]
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Li, Panyu [1 ]
Xie, Yi [1 ]
Xie, Hongyang [1 ]
Xie, Tonghui [1 ]
Zhang, Yongkui [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Dept Pharmaceut & Biol Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
chelated heavy metal; sulfate-reducing bacteria; bioconversion; EDTA-Cd; cadmium sulfide; ACID-MINE DRAINAGE; HEAVY-METAL REMOVAL; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; CADMIUM REMOVAL; ADSORPTION; BIOREMEDIATION; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; CHROMIUM;
D O I
10.1002/jctb.6461
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Chelated heavy metals have received wide attention due to their adverse effects and difficulty in removal. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) inducing heavy metals to produce metal sulfide precipitation is an attractive bioremediation technology. It not only reduces heavy metal pollution but also transforms metal contaminants into value-added products. RESULTS The stable ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-Cd was effectively removed and converted to CdS nanoparticles by SRB. The SRB could resist high concentrations of EDTA-Cd up to 2.5 mmol L-1, while no growth was observed at 1.0 mmol L(-1)of free cadmium ions. The bio-removal efficiencies of EDTA-Cd at initial concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mmol L(-1)were 100%, 100%, 95.89%, 67.63% and 26.66%, respectively. Meanwhile, the reduction efficiencies of sulfate by SRB were 45.6% to 24.9%. The products were cadmium sulfide nanoparticles with a mean particle size of 40-80 nm, which were confirmed by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy analyses. Furthermore, the cadmium sulfide product exhibited a good photocatalytic performance, and the removal efficiency of rhodamine B (RhB) reached 97% within 2 h. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that EDTA-Cd could be effectively removed by SRB and recovered in the form of high-value cadmium sulfide photocatalyst. The proposed strategy may provide a new solution for the recycling of chelated heavy metal ions. (c) 2020 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:3003 / 3011
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] VERSATILE MEDIUM FOR ENUMERATION OF SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIA
    POSTGATE, JR
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1963, 11 (03) : 265 - +
  • [42] Anaerobes response to oxygen: The sulfate-reducing bacteria
    LeGall, J
    Xavier, AV
    ANAEROBE, 1996, 2 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [43] The diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the seven bioreactors
    Ivan Kushkevych
    Jozef Kováč
    Monika Vítězová
    Tomáš Vítěz
    Milan Bartoš
    Archives of Microbiology, 2018, 200 : 945 - 950
  • [44] Abundance and Diversity of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in High Arsenic Shallow Aquifers
    Li, Ping
    Li, Bing
    Webster, Gordon
    Wang, Yanhong
    Jiang, Dawei
    Dai, Xinyue
    Jiang, Zhou
    Dong, Hailiang
    Wang, Yanxin
    GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (09) : 802 - 812
  • [45] GENETICS OF SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIA FOR IMPROVEMENT IN BIOREMEDIATION
    WALL, JD
    RAPPGILES, BJ
    ENGLISH, RS
    ARGYLE, J
    MURNAN, T
    WICKMAN, T
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, : 41 - 41
  • [46] Significance of sulfate-reducing bacteria in sewage treatment
    Radchenko, O.S.
    Tashirev, A.B.
    Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Vody, 1991, 13 (05): : 456 - 467
  • [47] INVESTIGATION OF SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIA ADHERED TO METALS
    SABIROVA, AK
    YUDINA, EG
    MURZAGILDIN, ZG
    NIZAMOV, KR
    YUMAGUZHIN, MS
    NEFTYANOE KHOZYAISTVO, 1986, (07): : 57 - 59
  • [48] Study examines sulfate-reducing bacteria activity
    McElhiney, JE
    Hardy, JA
    Rizk, TY
    Stott, JFD
    Eden, RD
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1996, 94 (50) : 68 - 69
  • [49] Sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic propionate systems
    Uberoi, V
    Bhattacharya, SK
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (07): : 675 - 682
  • [50] Dimethylsulfoxide reduction by marine sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Jonkers, HM
    vanderMaarel, MJEC
    vanGemerden, H
    Hansen, TA
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 1996, 136 (03) : 283 - 287