Is fairness blind?-The effect of framing on preferences for effort-sharing rules

被引:18
|
作者
Carlsson, Fredrik [1 ]
Kataria, Mitesh [2 ]
Lampi, Elina [1 ]
Lofgren, Asa [1 ]
Sterner, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Max Planck Inst Econ, Jena, Germany
关键词
Climate change; Fairness; Framing; Ethics; Effort-sharing rules; EQUITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper uses a choice experiment to study citizens' preferences for effort-sharing rules for reducing carbon dioxide emissions. For a given global cost and level of emission reduction, we study the willingness to pay for various rules that imply different distributions of the cost between EU, the US. China and Africa. The focus of this paper is on the use of two different treatments, one where the respondents were informed about the country (or country group) names and one where the names were replaced with anonymous labels A-D. This allows us to test whether people's preferences for effort-sharing rules depend on the framing of the problem. We find that the ranking of the rules and the strength of the preferences are not significantly different between the two treatments, and hence we find no evidence of ingroup bias in preferences for effort-sharing rules. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1529 / 1535
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条