The prognostic value of the lactate/albumin ratio for predicting mortality in septic patients presenting to the emergency department: a prospective study

被引:34
|
作者
Bou Chebl, Ralphe [1 ]
Geha, Mirabelle [1 ]
Assaf, Mohamad [1 ]
Kattouf, Nadim [1 ]
Haidar, Saadeddine [1 ]
Abdeldaem, Karim [1 ]
Halawi, Nour [1 ]
Khamis, Mohamed [1 ]
Makki, Maha [2 ]
Tamim, Hani [2 ]
Abou Dagher, Gilbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Emergency Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Internal Med, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Outcome; mortality; infection; sepsis; prognosis; emergency medicine; lactate; albumin; SEVERE SEPSIS; SERUM LACTATE; ORGAN FAILURE; LACTIC-ACIDOSIS; LEVEL; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2021.2009125
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Lactate/albumin (L/A) ratio is a biomarker in sepsis that has been shown to outperform lactate. This prospective study aims to validate the superior prognostic value of the L/A ratio to lactate in sepsis and septic shock. Methods Prospective cohort conducted from September 2018 till February 2021 on adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) at a tertiary care centre with sepsis or septic shock. The primary outcome was the prognostic value of the L/A ratio compared to lactate with regards to mortality. Results A total of 939 septic patients were included throughout the study period. A total of 236 patients developed septic shock. The AUC value of the L/A ratio in septic patients was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61-0.70) and was higher than that of lactate alone 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.64) with a p < .0001. The optimal L/A ratio cut-off threshold that separated survivors from non-survivors was found to be 0.115 for all septic patients. The AUC of the L/A ratio was significantly higher for patients with a lactate >= 2 mmol/L: 0.69 (95% CI 0.64-0.74) versus 0.60 (95% CI 0.54-0.66) with a p < .0001 as well as for patients with an albumin level less than 30 g/L (AUC = 0.69 95% CI= 0.62-0.75 vs AUC= 0.66 95% CI= 0.59-0.73, p = .04). Among septic shock patients there was no statically significant difference in the AUC value of the L/A ratio compared to lactate (0.53 95% CI 0.45-0.61 vs 0.50 95% CI 0.43-0.58 respectively with a p-value = .11). Conclusions The L/A ratio is a better predictor of in-patient mortality than lactate in sepsis patients. This superiority was not found in the septic shock subgroup. Our results encourage the use of the ratio early in the ED as a superior prognostic tool in sepsis patients. Key messages We aimed to assess the prognostic usefulness of the Lactate/Albumin ratio compared to lactate alone in septic and septic shock patients. The L/A ratio proved to be a better predictor of in-patient mortality than lactate alone in sepsis patients. This pattern also applies across various subgroups in our study (malignancy, diabetics, age above 65, lactate level less than 2 mmol/L, albumin less than 30 g/L). Our results favour the use of the L/A ratio over lactate alone in patients with sepsis and the previously mentioned subgroups. Our results do not favour the use of the ratio instead of lactate in septic shock patients as there was no statistically significant difference between the AUCs of the ratio and lactate alone.
引用
收藏
页码:2268 / 2277
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of time to antibiotic administration on mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department in septic shock
    Engineer, R. S.
    Duncan, D.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 50 (03) : S21 - S21
  • [42] Prognostic accuracy of qSOFA in predicting 28-day mortality among infected patients in an emergency department: a prospective validation study
    Bin Abdullah, S. M. Osama
    Sorensen, Rune Husas
    Dessau, Ram Benny Christian
    Sattar, Saifullah Muhammed Rafid Us
    Wiese, Lothar
    Nielsen, Finn Erland
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2019, 36 (12) : 722 - +
  • [43] Lactate to albumin ratio as a prognosis predictor in gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department
    Bae, Sung Jin
    Namgung, Myeong
    Jung, Kwang Yul
    Lee, Dong Hoon
    Choi, Yoon Hee
    Choi, Yunhyung
    Chung, Ho Sub
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, : 877 - 885
  • [44] Utility of the early lactate area score as a prognostic marker for septic shock patients in the emergency department
    Yu, Gina
    Yoo, Seung Joon
    Lee, Sang-Hun
    Kim, June Sung
    Jung, Sungmin
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Kim, Won Young
    Ryoo, Seung Mok
    ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 34 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [45] Lactate/albumin ratio prognostic value for mortality in patients older than 65 years with complicated urinary tract infection
    Madrazo, M.
    Lopez-Cruz, I.
    Piles, L.
    Alberola, J.
    Gandia, J. Mico
    Eiros, J. M.
    Artero, A.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2023, 223 (06): : 366 - 370
  • [46] Prospective study of mortality from sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock occurring in emergency department patients
    Shapiro, NI
    Moore, R
    Wolfe, RE
    Smith, E
    Bates, DW
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A65 - A65
  • [47] Prognostic value of lactate/albumin ratio in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure
    Golcuk, Yalcin
    Golcuk, Burcu Kaymak
    ANNALS OF HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 28 (06)
  • [48] Could Serum lactate/albumin ratio and Blood urea nitrogen /albumin ratio be Promising Prognostic Predictors in Patients with Sepsis and Septic shock? a retrospective cohort study
    Omnia Mohamed Mamdouh
    Abdallah Mohamed Goda
    Hadeer Ahmed Elshahaat
    Nagwan A. Ismail
    Ashraf ElsayedAhmed
    The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology, 19 (1):
  • [49] Arterial lactate as a prognostic tool to predict mortality and disposition in the emergency department: A prospective observational single-centre study
    Wilson, William
    Selvaraj, Dhiraj Ravindran
    Kumar, M. V. Ramya
    Jain, Vinayak
    Umra, Simran
    Murty, Shakuntala
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [50] Is There an Added Value of Arterial Lactate Compared to Venous Lactate in the Management of Infected Patients in the Emergency Department? Observational Prospective Study of 354 Patients
    Contenti, J.
    Occelli, C.
    Lemoel, F.
    Levraut, J.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE, 2020, 10 (01): : 3 - 8