Altruism as an Explanation for Human Consanguinity

被引:2
|
作者
Denic, Srdjan [1 ]
Agarwal, Mukesh M. [2 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] Calif Univ Sci & Med, San Bernardino, CA USA
关键词
Mate selection; Human altruism; Human inbreeding; Sociobiological principles of behavior; Public health; Community genetics; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; INCLUSIVE FITNESS; GROUP-SIZE; EVOLUTION; KIN; MARRIAGES; CHOICE; PREFERENCES; COOPERATION; RECIPROCITY;
D O I
10.1159/000518441
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Human inbreeding is a sociobiological puzzle. Despite widespread knowledge of its potential for genetic disorders, human consanguinity remains surprisingly common. The current reasons explaining its continued persistence in today's modern world have major shortcomings. Summary: We propose that the Neolithic Agrarian revolution modified the structure of populations. It increased competition for the limited resources in which a larger group had better chances of survival. As a result, small, drifting, socially open bands of hunter-gatherers were transformed into bigger, less mobile, and more powerful kinship groups (tribes). In this transformation, a central role was played by human trust - an aspect of human altruism which is a universal sociobiological principle of behavior. Altruism (and trust) is an essential premise of social contracts such as economic cooperation, marriage arrangement, and creation of alliances between people. In kinship groups, human trust is limited to kin, so tribes remain small, economically poor, and consanguineous due to lack of nonkin mates. The expanding of trust from kin to that of nonbiological relatives increases the size of human groups, fosters economic wealth, and decreases the rate of consanguinity. Key Messages: The lack of nonkin altruism leads to: (a) poverty (due to poor economic cooperation with nonkin), (b) maintaining small group size, and (c) inbreeding.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] EVOLUTIONARY EXPLANATION AND THE IDEAL OF ALTRUISM: THE INCOMMENSURABILITY OF THE CHRISTIAN LOVE COMMAND
    Brannan, Daniel K.
    Gillett, Carl
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) : 11 - 25
  • [12] Altruism does not always lead to a good reputation: A normative explanation
    Kawamura, Yuta
    Kusumi, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 90
  • [13] The nature of human altruism
    Ernst Fehr
    Urs Fischbacher
    Nature, 2003, 425 : 785 - 791
  • [14] The nature of human altruism
    Fehr, E
    Fischbacher, U
    NATURE, 2003, 425 (6960) : 785 - 791
  • [15] Explaining human altruism
    Vlerick, Michael
    SYNTHESE, 2020, 199 (1-2) : 2395 - 2413
  • [16] THE BIOLOGY OF HUMAN ALTRUISM
    WEXLER, MN
    SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1981, 56 (04): : 195 - 203
  • [17] THE EVOLUTION OF HUMAN ALTRUISM
    KITCHER, P
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1993, 90 (10): : 497 - 516
  • [18] The roots of human altruism
    Warneken, Felix
    Tomasello, Michael
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 100 : 455 - 471
  • [19] Explaining human altruism
    Michael Vlerick
    Synthese, 2021, 199 : 2395 - 2413
  • [20] Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases
    Bittles, A. H.
    Black, M. L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 : 1779 - 1786