Complications of percutaneous endoscopic and radiologic gastrostomy tube insertion: a KASID (Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases) study

被引:34
|
作者
Park, Soo-Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [2 ,3 ]
Koh, Seong-Joon [4 ]
Lee, Yoo Jin [5 ]
Jang, Hyun Joo [6 ]
Park, Soo Jung [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp,Div Gastroenterol, 29 Saemunan Ro, Seoul 031811, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Gastroenterol, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[4] Univ Seoul, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[5] Keimyung Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, 56 Dalseong Ro, Daegu 41931, South Korea
[6] Hallym Univ, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Internal Med, 7 Keunjaebong Gil, Hwaseong Si 18450, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy; Nutrition; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; PLACEMENT; HEAD; PEG;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6339-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundGastrostomy tube insertion is beneficial to selected patients, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) are two of the frequently used methods in gastrostomy. This study aimed to investigate the indications and complications of both PEG and PRG.MethodsThis was a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Patients who underwent initial PEG or PRG tube insertion for nutritional purpose between January 2010 and December 2015at five university hospitals were included in the study. We analyzed the indications and all complications related to gastrostomy, which were divided into the major (systemic or life-threatening) and minor (local and non-life-threatening) categories.ResultsA total of 418 patients who underwent PEG (n=324) and PRG (n=94) were reviewed. The indications for gastrostomy tube insertion were different and included mainly neurological disease (n=240, 74.1%) such as cerebrovascular accident in the PEG group (n=119, 36.7%) and mainly surgical disease (n=28, 29.8%) such as head and neck cancer (n=16, 17.0%) in the PRG group (p=0.05). There were no differences in the minor (16.4% vs. 19.1%, p=0.52) and major (12.3% vs. 14.9%, p=0.51) complication rates between the PEG and PRG groups. The risk factors for complications were age [yearly increments; odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06], tube diameter (1-Fr increments; OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.58), insertion time (1-min increments; OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13), and neurological disease as the gastrostomy indication (vs. surgical disease; OR 4.61 95% CI 1.47-14.42).ConclusionsIn our study, both PEG and PRG provided a safe route for nutrition delivery despite their different indications. Our data suggest that PEG might be the procedure of choice for patients with medical or neurological disease and PRG for patients with surgical disease in whom PEG is technically difficult or contraindicated.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 756
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Complications after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement - A Retrospective Analysis
    Jafari, A.
    Weismueller, T. J.
    Tonguc, T.
    Kalff, J. C.
    Manekeller, S.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2016, 141 (04): : 442 - 445
  • [42] Factors affecting late complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement
    Tiankanon, Kasenee
    Aniwan, Satimai
    Karuehardsuwan, Julalak
    Wiangngoen, Sumitra
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2022, 49 : 378 - 384
  • [43] Factors affecting late complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement
    Karuehardsuwan, Julalak
    Tiankanon, Kasenee
    Aniwan, Satimai
    Wiangngoen, Sumitra
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 181 - 181
  • [44] SMALL INTESTINAL PERFORATION FOLLOWING REPLACEMENT OF A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE
    WILSON, WCM
    ZENONE, EA
    SPECTOR, H
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (01) : 62 - 63
  • [45] A prospective randomized study of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion with and without a skin incision
    Machlenkin, SA
    Melzer, E
    Rimon, E
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB153 - AB153
  • [46] Insertion, efficacy, and removal of a nonendoscopically removable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube
    O. W. Cass
    K. Rowland
    B. Bartram
    J. R. Ross
    Y. Choe
    J. D. Hall
    Surgical Endoscopy, 1999, 13 : 516 - 519
  • [47] A Comparison of Complication Rates Between GI Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) and IR Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy (PRG) Tube Placement
    ElChaarani, Bilal
    Gal, Christopher
    Lukolic, Ismet
    Walsh, James
    Lee, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 : S54 - S55
  • [48] Insertion, efficacy, and removal of a nonendoscopically removable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube
    Cass, OW
    Rowland, K
    Bartram, B
    Ross, JR
    Choe, Y
    Hall, JD
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (05): : 516 - 519
  • [49] The Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Gastric Cancer A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study
    Park, Dong Il
    Park, Seung Ha
    Yoo, Tae Woo
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Yang, Suk-Kyun
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    Koh, Bong Min
    Kim, Jin Oh
    Shim, Ki-Nam
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Lee, Bo In
    Choi, Kyu Yong
    Lee, Hang Lak
    Han, Dong Soo
    Baek, Ilhyun
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Park, Seun Ja
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 44 (02) : 102 - 105
  • [50] Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Radiologic Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Adult Oncology Patients
    Vashi, Pankaj
    Edwin, Persis
    Gupta, Digant
    Fulp, Charles J.
    Popiel, Brenten
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB234 - AB235