A multi-criteria decision analysis approach towards efficient rainwater harvesting

被引:52
|
作者
Toosi, Amirhossein Shadmehri [1 ]
Tousi, Erfan Ghasemi [2 ]
Ghassemi, Seyed Ali [1 ]
Cheshomi, Ali [3 ]
Alaghmand, Sina [4 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Civil Engn, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn & Mech, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Civil Engn & Environm Engn, Milan, Italy
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 23 Coll Walk, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Rainwater harvesting; Decision support system; Geospatial techniques; Water conservation; STATE GROUNDWATER INFLOW; GIS-BASED APPROACH; POTENTIAL SITES; WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MASHHAD PLAIN; RIVER-BASIN; SCS-CN; IMPACTS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124501
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) is becoming one of the most promising alternative sources of fresh water which can be potentially captured and utilized, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions (ASARs). However, identification of potential sites for RWH on a large scale has always been a great challenge, and therefore, requires further studies. Most recent studies on this topic select RWH zones employing Geographic Information Systems (GIS), combined with multi-criteria analysis and hydrological models. Nevertheless, there are a few studies, mostly in small catchments, that locate potential zones considering socio-economic factors. In this paper, a GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is presented to identify potential RWH areas incorporating socio-economic factors including distance from drainage networks, roads, urban areas, faults, farms and wells. The proposed methodology was implemented at a large catchment scale in Mashhad Plain Basin with an area of 9762 (km(2)) located in the northeast of Iran. Results show that 48% of the study area is not suitable for RWH. The rest of the study area is divided into three potential zones that are poor, moderate and good for RWH, covering 31%, 43%, and 26% of the potential areas, respectively. Ponds and pans, check dams and terracing were considered as the best practices for the good RWH potential areas. Preliminary estimates suggest that up to 158, 135 and 110 M m(3) of precipitation could be received respectively by each system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods Comparison
    Zlaugotne, Beate
    Zihare, Lauma
    Balode, Lauma
    Kalnbalkite, Antra
    Khabdullin, Aset
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 24 (01) : 454 - 471
  • [32] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [33] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Thokala, Praveen
    Madhavan, Guruprasad
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [34] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226
  • [35] A generalized approach for multi-criteria decision aid methods
    Larbani, Moussa
    Aouni, Belaid
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025, : 1187 - 1215
  • [36] A general decomposition approach for multi-criteria decision trees
    Frini, Anissa
    Guitouni, Adel
    Martel, Jean-Marc
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 220 (02) : 452 - 460
  • [37] Planning rainwater conservation measures using geospatial and multi-criteria decision making tools
    Singh, Laishram Kanta
    Jha, Madan Kumar
    Chowdary, V. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (02) : 1734 - 1751
  • [38] Harvesting European knowledge on soil functions and land management using multi-criteria decision analysis
    Bampa, Francesca
    O'Sullivan, Lilian
    Madena, Kirsten
    Sanden, Taru
    Spiegel, Heide
    Henriksen, Christian Bugge
    Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur
    Jones, Arwyn
    Staes, Jan
    Sturel, Sylvain
    Trajanov, Aneta
    Creamer, Rachel E.
    Debeljak, Marko
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 35 (01) : 6 - 20
  • [39] Planning rainwater conservation measures using geospatial and multi-criteria decision making tools
    Laishram Kanta Singh
    Madan Kumar Jha
    V. M. Chowdary
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 1734 - 1751
  • [40] Evaluation of electricity supply sustainability and security: Multi-criteria decision analysis approach
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Dong, Liang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 438 - 453