Energy-based comparison between a dynamic cone penetrometer and a motor-operated static cone penetrometer

被引：13

作者：

Sun, Y. ^{[1
]}

Cheng, Q. ^{[1
]}

Lin, J. ^{[2
]}

Lammers, P. Schulze ^{[3
]}

Berg, A. ^{[3
]}

Meng, F. ^{[1
]}

Zeng, Q. ^{[4
]}

Li, L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Agr Engn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany

[4] S China Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, Peoples R China

来源：

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH | 2011年 / 115卷

关键词：

Dynamic cone penetrometer; Static cone penetrometer; Penetration resistance; Energy loss; SOIL PENETRATION RESISTANCE; TDR MOISTURE PROBE; WATER-CONTENT; MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE; GROWTH; ROOTS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.still.2011.06.005

中图分类号：

S15 [土壤学];

学科分类号：

0903 ; 090301 ;

摘要：

Dynamic cone penetrometers (DCP) have been available for many years. However, there is still an uncertainty between the simplified Dutch Formula and the complete one. As a continual approach to assess both formulae, this study provides an energy-based comparison between a DCP and a motor-operated static cone penetrometer (SCP). The results yielded by SCP were regarded as reference. Through the designed experiment, we observed that both formulae considerably extenuated the energy loss arisen from strikes, which was equivalent to an overestimation of the calculated penetration force. Since the overestimation is greater than the uncertainty between both formulae, a better analytical model is required. Regarding the energy loss, the shaft vibration should also be taken into account for correcting each formula. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：105 / 109

页数：5

共 50 条

[41] Compaction Quality Control of Earth Fills Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
Chennarapu, Hariprasad
Garala, Thejesh Kumar
Chennareddy, Rajasekhar
Balunaini, Umashankar
Reddy, G. Venkata Narasimha
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 144 (09)
[42] Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Compacted Clay-Sand Layers
Dafalla, Muawia
Shaker, Abdullah
Al-Shamrani, Mosleh
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (22):
[43] Methodology of layers’ compaction control through dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP)
Liseane Padilha Thives
Glicério Trichês
Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (13)
[44] Comparison of the dynamic cone penetrometer with other tests during subgrade and granular base characterization in Minnesota
Siekmeier, JA
Young, D
Beberg, D
NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF PAVEMENTS AND BACKCALCULATION OF MODULI, 3RD VOLUME, 2000, 1375 : 175 - 188
[45] CORRELATION BETWEEN CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO AND DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER STRENGTH MEASUREMENT OF SOILS - DISCUSSION
GRANT, MC
HARISON, JA
NATAATMADJA, A
WOODMAN, GR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS PART 2-RESEARCH AND THEORY, 1989, 87 : 119 - 125
[46] CORRELATION BETWEEN CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO AND DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER STRENGTH MEASUREMENT OF SOILS.
Harison, J.A.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (London), 1987, 83 (pt 2): : 833 - 844
[47] Profile cone penetrometer data used to distinguish between soil materials
Grunwald, S
Lowery, B
Rooney, DJ
McSweeney, K
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2001, 62 (1-2): : 27 - 40
[48] Dynamic cone penetrometer in quality control of compaction, state-of-the-art report
Amini, F
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS, VOL 1, 2004, (126): : 1023 - 1031
[49] Application of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) for determination of the engineering parameters of sandy soils
Mohammadi, S. D.
Nikoudel, M. R.
Rahimi, H.
Khamehichiyan, M.
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2008, 101 (3-4) : 195 - 203
[50] Applying the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Design Method to Low Volume Roads
Paige-Green, Philip
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH AFRICAN REGIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING: RESOURCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNICS IN AFRICA: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2011, : 422 - 430

← 1 2 3 4 5 →