Energy-based comparison between a dynamic cone penetrometer and a motor-operated static cone penetrometer

被引：13

作者：

Sun, Y. ^{[1
]}

Cheng, Q. ^{[1
]}

Lin, J. ^{[2
]}

Lammers, P. Schulze ^{[3
]}

Berg, A. ^{[3
]}

Meng, F. ^{[1
]}

Zeng, Q. ^{[4
]}

Li, L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Agr Engn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany

[4] S China Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, Peoples R China

来源：

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH | 2011年 / 115卷

关键词：

Dynamic cone penetrometer; Static cone penetrometer; Penetration resistance; Energy loss; SOIL PENETRATION RESISTANCE; TDR MOISTURE PROBE; WATER-CONTENT; MECHANICAL IMPEDANCE; GROWTH; ROOTS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.still.2011.06.005

中图分类号：

S15 [土壤学];

学科分类号：

0903 ; 090301 ;

摘要：

Dynamic cone penetrometers (DCP) have been available for many years. However, there is still an uncertainty between the simplified Dutch Formula and the complete one. As a continual approach to assess both formulae, this study provides an energy-based comparison between a DCP and a motor-operated static cone penetrometer (SCP). The results yielded by SCP were regarded as reference. Through the designed experiment, we observed that both formulae considerably extenuated the energy loss arisen from strikes, which was equivalent to an overestimation of the calculated penetration force. Since the overestimation is greater than the uncertainty between both formulae, a better analytical model is required. Regarding the energy loss, the shaft vibration should also be taken into account for correcting each formula. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：105 / 109

页数：5

共 50 条

[1] Comparison of the dynamic cone penetration test (DCP) and PANDA® variable energy dynamic cone penetrometer
Lopez, Sebastian
Benz, Miguel
Moustan, Philippe
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IN THE XXI CENTURY: LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2019, : 1552 - 1561
[2] Compaction control with a dynamic cone penetrometer
Chaigneau, L
Gourves, R
Boissier, D
COMPACTION OF SOILS, GRANULATES AND POWDERS, 2000, 3 : 103 - 109
[3] Comparison of PANDA® variable energy dynamic cone penetrometer tests and static and synamic load plate test
Lopez, Sebastian
Benz, Miguel
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IN THE XXI CENTURY: LESSONS LEARNED AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2019, : 1562 - 1571
[4] Instrumented Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Corrected with Transferred Energy into a Cone Tip: A Laboratory Study
Byun, Yong-Hoon
Lee, Jong-Sub
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2013, 36 (04): : 533 - 542
[5] A Statistical Investigation of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test
Hamed Farshbaf Aghajani
Milad Hatefi Diznab
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2023, 9
[6] Prediction of CBR Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
Al-Refeai, Talal
Al-Suhaibani, A.
Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 1997, 9 (02): : 191 - 203
[7] A Statistical Investigation of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test
Aghajani, Hamed Farshbaf
Diznab, Milad Hatefi
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOSYNTHETICS AND GROUND ENGINEERING, 2023, 9 (01)
[8] Development of models for the interpretation of the dynamic cone penetrometer data
Boutet, Melanie
Dore, Guy
Bilodeau, Jean-Pascal
Pierre, Pascal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2011, 12 (03) : 201 - 214
[9] Prediction of CBR using dynamic cone penetrometer index
Sagar, C. P.
Badiger, Mohan
Mamatha, K. H.
Dinesh, S. V.
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 60 : 223 - 228
[10] Use of instrumented dynamic cone penetrometer in pavement characterization
Nazarian, S
Tandon, V
Crain, K
Yuan, D
NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF PAVEMENTS AND BACKCALCULATION OF MODULI, 3RD VOLUME, 2000, 1375 : 214 - 228

← 1 2 3 4 5 →