Wetland ecosystem services research: A critical review

被引:133
|
作者
Xu, Xibao [1 ]
Chen, Minkun [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Guishan [1 ]
Jiang, Bo [3 ]
Zhang, Ji [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Changjiang Water Resources Protect Inst, Wuhan 430051, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Wuhan Lib, Wuhan 430071, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Wetland ecosystem services; Systematic review; Limitations; Policy design; FRESH-WATER; MANAGEMENT; VALUATION; CONSERVATION; ASSESSMENTS; CHALLENGES; EXTENT; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01027
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Systematic knowledge of the development, trends, and limitations of wetland ecosystem services (WES) is extremely meaningful for the direction of WES studies and wetland management. A systematic literature review was conducted by collecting 1711 peer-reviewed articles through the Web of Science and ScienceDirect by searching the "topic" domain using the combined keywords "ecosystem service" OR "ecosystem services" and "wetland". The results indicated that current studies focus on WES evaluation, driving factors, wetland management, and policy design, which accounted for 90.9% of the obtained articles. The driving factors are mainly multiple factors, land use change, policy and management, and climate change. Riverine wetlands, multiple wetland types, and lacustrine wetlands are the main wetland types in existing studies, and the evaluated WES types are mainly supporting and regulating services. The applied evaluation approaches mainly include the biophysical and qualitative methods, which accounted for 76.4% and 14.3% of the total studies, respectively. Two main limitations in WES studies are a lack of unified WES evaluation indicators and comprehensive WES studies. In the future, WES research should focus on generating unified WES evaluation indicators for comparison across different studies and up-scaling. Long-term program should be established to gather data for creating ecological production functions to determine the marginal influence of wetland land characteristics on the final WES to refine the management options. Stakeholders should also be involved in the process of designing payments for ecosystem services programs. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] State-of-the art valuation of wetland ecosystem services in Small Island Developing States: A systematic review with an emphasis on future research needs
    Moonsammy, Stephan
    Boman, Mattias
    Ramdhanie, Vidwatee
    Renn-Moonsammy, Donna -Marie
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 68
  • [32] Ecosystem services in the floodplains: Socio-cultural services associated with ecosystem unpredictability in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil
    Chiaravalloti, Rafael Morais
    Bolzan, Fabio
    Roque, Fabio de Oliveira
    Biswas, Sumalika
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 25 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [33] Realizing ecosystem services: wetland hydrologic function along a gradient of ecosystem condition
    McLaughlin, Daniel L.
    Cohen, Matthew J.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2013, 23 (07) : 1619 - 1631
  • [34] Soil "Ecosystem" Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground
    Baveye, Philippe C.
    Baveye, Jacques
    Gowdy, John
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 4
  • [35] Inequality and ecosystem services: The value and social distribution of Niger Delta wetland services
    Adekola, Olalekan
    Mitchell, Gordon
    Grainger, Alan
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 : 42 - 54
  • [36] A review of published wetland research, 1991-2008: Ecological engineering and ecosystem restoration
    Zhang, Liang
    Wang, Ming-Huang
    Hu, Jie
    Ho, Yuh-Shan
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 36 (08) : 973 - 980
  • [37] Wetland ecosystem services in California's Central Valley and implications for the Wetland Reserve Program
    Duffy, Walter G.
    Kahara, Sharon N.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (03) : S18 - S30
  • [38] Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Critical Assessment
    James, Simon P.
    ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 18 (03) : 338 - 350
  • [39] Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions
    Yuanyuan Zhao
    Zhifeng Liu
    Jianguo Wu
    Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35 : 793 - 814
  • [40] The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review
    Ľuboš Slovák
    Jan Daněk
    Tomáš Daněk
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10