A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods

被引：534
|
作者：
Sun, Chia-Chi [1 ]
机构：
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Technol Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
来源：
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS | 2010年 / 37卷 / 12期
关键词：
Fuzzy set; Performance evaluation; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM); ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BENCHMARKING; SELECTION; DESIGN; SERVICE; SYSTEM; SCALE; FIRMS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) research has developed rapidly and has become a main area of research for dealing with complex decision problems. The purpose of the paper is to explore the performance evaluation model. This paper develops an evaluation model based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution, fuzzy TOPSIS, to help the industrial practitioners for the performance evaluation in a fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic values parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. The proposed method enables decision analysts to better understand the complete evaluation process and provide a more accurate, effective, and systematic decision support tool. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：7745 / 7754
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OPERATING SYSTEM SELECTION USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHODS
    Balli, Serkan
    Korukoglu, Serdar
    MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 14 (02): : 119 - 130
  • [32] Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives
    Torfi, Fatemeh
    Farahani, Reza Zanjirani
    Rezapour, Shabnam
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 10 (02) : 520 - 528
  • [33] EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT WEBSITES USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Gocer, Fethullah
    UNCERTAINTY MODELLING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 10 : 930 - 935
  • [34] Evaluating the Renewal Degree for Expressway Regeneration Projects Based on a Model Integrating the Fuzzy Delphi Method, the Fuzzy AHP Method, and the TOPSIS Method
    Zhu, Min
    Zhou, Wenbo
    Hu, Min
    Du, Juan
    Yuan, Tengfei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [35] Indicators of Entrepreneurial University: Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach
    Kiani Mavi R.
    Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2014, 5 (2) : 370 - 387
  • [36] A spherical fuzzy methodology integrating maximizing deviation and TOPSIS methods
    Farrokhizadeh, Elmira
    Seyfi-Shishavan, Seyed Amin
    Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu
    Donyatalab, Yaser
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Seifi, Seyyed Hadi
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 101
  • [37] An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach in the hotel industry
    Nguyen Quang Vinh
    Quang Hung Do
    Luc Manh Hien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (10): : 135 - 148
  • [38] Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) : 3992 - 3998
  • [39] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [40] Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing
    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Malgorzata
    Antosz, Katarzyna
    Wyczolkowski, Ryszard
    Mazurkiewicz, Dariusz
    Sun, Bo
    Qian, Cheng
    Ren, Yi
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (05)
12345