Adjoint sensitivity analysis method for dynamic optimization of multibody systems considering collision and friction

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Mengru [1 ]
Song, Ningning [1 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ]
Peng, Haijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Dept Engn Mech, State Key Lab Struct Anal Ind Equipment, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multibody system; Contact and friction; Dynamic optimization; Sensitivity analysis; Adjoint variable method; CONSTRAINTS; CONTACT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-022-03334-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Collision and friction will cause the nonsmooth phenomenon of the state variables of mechanisms, and affect the stability and dynamic behavior of multibody systems. For the dynamic optimization of multibody systems, the optimization methods roughly include gradient-free methods and gradient methods. The gradient-free optimization methods need a lot of function evaluation, and the convergence speed is often quite slow. However, gradient optimization methods can obtain optimization results with less iterations. Among them, gradient, that is, dynamic sensitivity analysis, is inevitable and difficult, and there are few research reports. Taking contact and friction phenomena into consideration, an adjoint sensitivity analysis method for dynamic optimization of multibody systems is proposed in this paper. The calculation formulas of analytical and semi-analytical sensitivity analysis methods and optimization flow are given. In addition, the availability and engineering practicability of the proposed method are verified by the dynamic optimization examples of rigid five-bar mechanism and rigid-flexible tensegrity structure.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural sensitivity analysis of flexible multibody systems modeled with the floating frame of reference approach using the adjoint variable method
    Alexander Held
    Sven Knüfer
    Robert Seifried
    Multibody System Dynamics, 2017, 40 : 287 - 302
  • [22] Structural sensitivity analysis of flexible multibody systems modeled with the floating frame of reference approach using the adjoint variable method
    Held, Alexander
    Knuefer, Sven
    Seifried, Robert
    MULTIBODY SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2017, 40 (03) : 287 - 302
  • [23] Optimization of flexible multibody systems with composite materials:: Sensitivity analysis and optimization procedures
    Neto, M. A.
    Leal, R. P.
    Amborsio, J.
    STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS - EURODYN 2005, VOLS 1-3, 2005, : 573 - 580
  • [24] A Method of Analog Circuit Optimization Using Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis
    Joshi, Deepak
    Dash, Satyabrata
    Bhattacharjee, R.
    Trivedi, Gaurav
    2015 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE RADIOELEKTRONIKA (RADIOELEKTRONIKA), 2015, : 75 - +
  • [25] Sensitivity analysis of statistical-dynamic model by adjoint method
    Xiang, Jie
    Zhang, Xi-jun
    Luan, Yi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NONLINEAR MECHANICS, 2007, : 1563 - 1567
  • [26] Multibody dynamic modeling and analysis of cable-driven snake robot considering clearance and friction based on ALE method
    You, Pu
    Liu, Zhuyong
    Ma, Ziqi
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2023, 184
  • [27] On the consistency of adjoint sensitivity analysis for structural optimization of linear dynamic problems
    Jakob S. Jensen
    Praveen B. Nakshatrala
    Daniel A. Tortorelli
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49 : 831 - 837
  • [28] On the consistency of adjoint sensitivity analysis for structural optimization of linear dynamic problems
    Jensen, Jakob S.
    Nakshatrala, Praveen B.
    Tortorelli, Daniel A.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 49 (05) : 831 - 837
  • [29] Second order adjoint sensitivity analysis of multibody systems described by differential-algebraic equations
    Ding, Jie-Yu
    Pan, Zhen-Kuan
    Chen, Li-Qun
    MULTIBODY SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2007, 18 (04) : 599 - 617
  • [30] Analysis and optimization of complex multibody systems using advanced sensitivity analysis methods
    Eberhard, P
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 1996, 76 : 40 - 43