Automatic post-selection by ancillae thermalization

被引:2
|
作者
Wright, L. [1 ]
Barratt, F. [2 ]
Dborin, J. [3 ]
Booth, G. H. [1 ]
Green, A. G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Phys, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Math, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] UCL, London Ctr Nanotechnol, Gordon St, London WC1H 0AH, England
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH | 2021年 / 3卷 / 03期
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033151
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Tasks such as classification of data and determining the ground state of a Hamiltonian cannot be carried out through purely unitary quantum evolution. Instead, the inherent nonunitarity of the measurement process must be harnessed. Post-selection and its extensions provide a way to do this. However, they make inefficient use of time resources-a typical computation might require O(2(m)) measurements over m qubits to reach a desired accuracy and cannot be done intermittently on current (superconducting-based) NISQ devices. We propose a method inspired by thermalization that harnesses insensitivity to the details of the bath. We find a greater robustness to gate noise by coupling to this bath, with a similar cost in time and more qubits compared to alternate methods for inducing nonlinearity such as fixed-point quantum search for oblivious amplitude amplification. Post-selection on m ancillae qubits is replaced with tracing out O[log epsilon / log(1 - p)] (where p is the probability of a successful measurement) to attain the same accuracy as the post-selection circuit. We demonstrate this scheme on the quantum perceptron, quantum gearbox, and phase estimation algorithm. This method is particularly advantageous on current quantum computers involving superconducting circuits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Analysis of Post-selection in Automatic Configuration
    Yuan, Zhi
    Stuetzle, Thomas
    de Oca, Marco A. Montes
    Lau, Hoong Chuin
    Birattari, Mauro
    GECCO'13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2013, : 1557 - 1564
  • [2] Post-Selection Inference
    Kuchibhotla, Arun K.
    Kolassa, John E.
    Kuffner, Todd A.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, 2022, 9 : 505 - 527
  • [3] Post-selection and quantum energetics
    Rogers, Spencer
    Jordan, Andrew N.
    arXiv, 2022,
  • [4] VALID POST-SELECTION INFERENCE
    Berk, Richard
    Brown, Lawrence
    Buja, Andreas
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhao, Linda
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2013, 41 (02): : 802 - 837
  • [5] The Limits of Post-Selection Generalization
    Nissim, Kobbi
    Smith, Adam
    Steinke, Thomas
    Stemmer, Uri
    Ullman, Jonathan
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [6] The post-selection operator current
    Gray, John E.
    Addison, Stephen R.
    QUANTUM STUDIES-MATHEMATICS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2018, 5 (03) : 399 - 412
  • [7] Splitting strategies for post-selection inference
    Rasines, D. Garcia
    Young, G. A.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2023, 110 (03) : 597 - 614
  • [8] On Post-selection Inference in A/B Testing
    Deng, Alex
    Li, Yicheng
    Lu, Jiannan
    Ramamurthy, Vivek
    KDD '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2021, : 2743 - 2752
  • [9] On overfitting and post-selection uncertainty assessments
    Hong, L.
    Kuffner, T. A.
    Martin, R.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2018, 105 (01) : 221 - 224
  • [10] The Post-Selection Probability Current and Its Implications
    Gray, John E.
    Parks, Allen D.
    QUANTUM INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION VII, 2009, 7342