Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

被引:96
|
作者
Sasaki, Ryoko [1 ]
Takeda, Yuichiro
Funato, Osamu
Nitta, Hiroyuki
Kawamura, Hidenobu
Uesugi, Noriyuki
Sugai, Tamotsu
Wakabayashi, Go
Ohkohchi, Nobuhiro
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Comprehens Human Sci, Dept Surg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[2] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Morioka, Iwate 020, Japan
[3] Iwate Med Univ, Dept Cent Clin Lab, Div Pathol, Morioka, Iwate 020, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-007-9102-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to determine whether carcinoma in situ at the bile duct margin is prognostically different from residual invasive carcinoma in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Summary Background Data Although there are many reports that the ductal margin status at bile duct resection stumps is a prognostic indicator in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, some patients who undergo resection with microscopic tumor involvement of the bile duct margin survive longer than expected. Methods A retrospective clinicopathological analysis of 128 patients who had undergone surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was conducted. The status of the bile duct resection margin was classifiedas negative in 105 patients (82.0%), positive for carcinoma in situ in 12 patients (9.4%), and positive for invasive carcinoma in 11 patients (8.6%). Results Ductal margin status was an independent prognostic indicator by both univariate (p = 0.0022) and multivariate (p = 0.0105) analyses, along with lymph node metastasis. There was no significant difference between patients with a negative ductal margin and those with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (p = 0.5247). The 5-year survival rate of patients with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (22.2%) was significantly better (p = 0.0241) than with invasive carcinoma (0%). There was a significant relationship between local recurrence and ductal margin status (p = 0.0401). Conclusions Among patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, invasive carcinoma at the ductal resection margins appears to have a significant relation to local recurrence and also a significant negative impact on survival, whereas residual carcinoma in situ does not. Discrimination whether carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma is present is important in clinical setting in which the resection margin at the ductal stump is positive.
引用
收藏
页码:1788 / 1796
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of tumour budding grade in 310 patients who underwent surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Ogino, Mariko
    Nakanishi, Yoshitsugu
    Mitsuhashi, Tomoko
    Hatanaka, Yutaka
    Amano, Toraji
    Marukawa, Katsuji
    Nitta, Takeo
    Ueno, Takashi
    Ono, Masato
    Kuwabara, Shota
    Yamada, Tooru
    Hirano, Satoshi
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 74 (06) : 861 - 872
  • [22] Prognostic significance of serum CA 19-9 response and dynamics in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing surgical resection
    DiPeri, Timothy P.
    Newhook, Timothy E.
    Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
    Chun, Yun Shin
    Lee, Sunyoung S.
    Javle, Milind M.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Cao, Hop Sanderson Tran
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04)
  • [23] Prognostic Significance of NLR, PLR, LMR and Tumor Infiltrating T Lymphocytes in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Lin, Zhi-qiang
    Ma, Chi
    Cao, Wen-zhuo
    Ning, Zhen
    Tan, Guang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [24] KRAS Mutation Status Dictates Optimal Surgical Margin Width in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Georgios A. Margonis
    Kazunari Sasaki
    Nikolaos Andreatos
    Yuhree Kim
    Katiuscha Merath
    Doris Wagner
    Ana Wilson
    Stefan Buettner
    Neda Amini
    Efstathios Antoniou
    Timothy M. Pawlik
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 264 - 271
  • [25] KRAS Mutation Status Dictates Optimal Surgical Margin Width in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Margonis, Georgios A.
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    Andreatos, Nikolaos
    Kim, Yuhree
    Merath, Katiuscha
    Wagner, Doris
    Wilson, Ana
    Buettner, Stefan
    Amini, Neda
    Antoniou, Efstathios
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (01) : 264 - 271
  • [26] Significance of the resection margin and risk factors for close or positive resection margin in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery
    Gatek, J.
    Vrana, D.
    Melichar, B.
    Vazan, P.
    Kotocova, K.
    Kotoc, J.
    Dudesek, B.
    Hnatek, L.
    Duben, J.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2012, 17 (03): : 452 - 456
  • [27] Prognostic value of resection margin length after surgical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Zhu, Hongxu
    Wang, Longrong
    Wang, Miao
    He, Xigan
    Xu, Weiqi
    Zhu, Weiping
    Zhao, Yiming
    Wang, Lu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 222 (02): : 383 - 389
  • [28] Prognostic Significance of the Preoperative Controlled Nutritional Status Score in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection
    Shao, Jingjing
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Xun Lei
    Wang, Gaoren
    NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 73 (11-12): : 2211 - 2218
  • [29] Importance of Surgical Margin Status in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Shaikh, Talha
    Li, Tianyu
    Murphy, Colin T.
    Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
    Bleicher, Richard J.
    Sigurdson, Elin R.
    Carlson, Robert
    Hayes, Shelly B.
    Anderson, Penny
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2016, 16 (04) : 312 - 318
  • [30] MAJOR HEPATIC RESECTION FOR EXTRAHEPATIC CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA - ANALYSIS OF 38 PATIENTS
    MUNOZJUAREZ, M
    FARNELL, MB
    DONOHUE, JH
    ILSTRUP, DM
    NAGORNEY, DM
    HEPATOLOGY, 1995, 22 (04) : 157 - 157