Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

被引:96
|
作者
Sasaki, Ryoko [1 ]
Takeda, Yuichiro
Funato, Osamu
Nitta, Hiroyuki
Kawamura, Hidenobu
Uesugi, Noriyuki
Sugai, Tamotsu
Wakabayashi, Go
Ohkohchi, Nobuhiro
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Comprehens Human Sci, Dept Surg, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[2] Iwate Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Morioka, Iwate 020, Japan
[3] Iwate Med Univ, Dept Cent Clin Lab, Div Pathol, Morioka, Iwate 020, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-007-9102-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The objective of this study was to determine whether carcinoma in situ at the bile duct margin is prognostically different from residual invasive carcinoma in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Summary Background Data Although there are many reports that the ductal margin status at bile duct resection stumps is a prognostic indicator in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, some patients who undergo resection with microscopic tumor involvement of the bile duct margin survive longer than expected. Methods A retrospective clinicopathological analysis of 128 patients who had undergone surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was conducted. The status of the bile duct resection margin was classifiedas negative in 105 patients (82.0%), positive for carcinoma in situ in 12 patients (9.4%), and positive for invasive carcinoma in 11 patients (8.6%). Results Ductal margin status was an independent prognostic indicator by both univariate (p = 0.0022) and multivariate (p = 0.0105) analyses, along with lymph node metastasis. There was no significant difference between patients with a negative ductal margin and those with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (p = 0.5247). The 5-year survival rate of patients with a positive ductal margin with carcinoma in situ (22.2%) was significantly better (p = 0.0241) than with invasive carcinoma (0%). There was a significant relationship between local recurrence and ductal margin status (p = 0.0401). Conclusions Among patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, invasive carcinoma at the ductal resection margins appears to have a significant relation to local recurrence and also a significant negative impact on survival, whereas residual carcinoma in situ does not. Discrimination whether carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma is present is important in clinical setting in which the resection margin at the ductal stump is positive.
引用
收藏
页码:1788 / 1796
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Significance of Ductal Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Ryoko Sasaki
    Yuichiro Takeda
    Osamu Funato
    Hiroyuki Nitta
    Hidenobu Kawamura
    Noriyuki Uesugi
    Tamotsu Sugai
    Go Wakabayashi
    Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
    World Journal of Surgery, 2007, 31 : 1788 - 1796
  • [2] Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Wakai, T
    Shirai, Y
    Moroda, T
    Yokoyama, N
    Hatakeyama, K
    CANCER, 2005, 103 (06) : 1210 - 1216
  • [3] Significance of proximal ductal margin status after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Yohanathan, Lavanya
    Croome, Kristopher P.
    Traynor, Michael
    Puig, Carlos A.
    Mara, Kristin C.
    Cleary, Sean P.
    Nagorney, David M.
    HPB, 2021, 23 (01) : 109 - 117
  • [4] Surgical management of carcinoma in situ at ductal resection margins in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Wakai, Toshifumi
    Sakata, Jun
    Katada, Tomohiro
    Hirose, Yuki
    Soma, Daiki
    Prasoon, Pankaj
    Miura, Kohei
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2018, 2 (05): : 359 - 366
  • [5] Significance of dysplasia in bile duct resection margin in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis
    Choe, Jung Wan
    Kim, Hyo Jung
    Kim, Jae Seon
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (10) : 3078 - 3087
  • [6] Significance of dysplasia in bile duct resection margin in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma:A retrospective analysis
    Jung Wan Choe
    Hyo Jung Kim
    Jae Seon Kim
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, (10) : 3078 - 3087
  • [7] Clinical impact of intraoperative histological examination of the ductal resection margin in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Konishi, M.
    Iwasaki, M.
    Ochiai, A.
    Hasebe, T.
    Ojima, H.
    Yanagisawa, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (09) : 1363 - 1368
  • [8] Higher Tumor Burden Status Dictates the Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Yutaka Endo
    Kazunari Sasaki
    Zorays Moazzam
    Henrique A. Lima
    Laura Alaimo
    Alfredo Guglielmi
    Luca Aldrighetti
    Matthew Weiss
    Todd W. Bauer
    Sorin Alexandrescu
    George A. Poultsides
    Minoru Kitago
    Shishir K. Maithel
    Hugo P. Marques
    Guillaume Martel
    Carlo Pulitano
    Feng Shen
    François Cauchy
    Bas Groot Koerkamp
    Itaru Endo
    Timothy M. Pawlik
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 2023 - 2032
  • [9] Higher Tumor Burden Status Dictates the Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Endo, Yutaka
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    Moazzam, Zorays
    Lima, Henrique A.
    Alaimo, Laura
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Aldrighetti, Luca
    Weiss, Matthew
    Bauer, Todd W.
    Alexandrescu, Sorin
    Poultsides, George A.
    Kitago, Minoru
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Marques, Hugo P.
    Martel, Guillaume
    Pulitano, Carlo
    Shen, Feng
    Cauchy, Francois
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Endo, Itaru
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) : 2023 - 2032
  • [10] Survival analysis and prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    van der Gaag, N. A.
    Kloek, J. J.
    de Bakker, J. K.
    Musters, B.
    Geskus, R. B.
    Busch, O. R. C.
    Bosma, A.
    Gouma, D. J.
    van Gulik, T. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (10) : 2642 - 2649