Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting

被引:37
|
作者
Jacob, Celine [1 ]
Vaissiere, Anne-Charlotte [2 ]
Bas, Adeline [3 ]
Calvet, Coralie [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 3, EPHE, Univ Montpellier, CREOCEAN,CEFE UMR 5175,CNRS, Route Mende, F-34199 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Fac Econ, UMR LAMETA 5474, Ave Raymond Dugrand, F-34960 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Brest, UMR Amure, UMR M101, EDF Energies Nouvelles, 12 Rue Kergoat,Batiment B,CS 93837, F-29238 Brest 3, France
[4] Univ Avignon & Pays Vaucluse, UMR CNRS IRD 7263 237, Inst Mediterraneen Biodivers & Ecol, INRA Ecodev UR0767,IUT Avignon, Site Agroparc,BP 61207, F-84911 Avignon 09, France
关键词
Ecosystem services; Biodiversity offset; Mitigation hierarchy; Environmental Impact Assessment; No Net Loss; WETLAND MITIGATION; COMMUNITY; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; LOSSES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In response to growing international interest regarding the consideration of ecosystem services (ES) in the framework of biodiversity offsetting (BO) and the current lack of guidelines on the subject, we investigated the potential inclusion of ES in BO, highlighting the risks and opportunities. Our argument is premised on the assumption that a practical link already exists between the two and that most of the tools required to make this approach operational are available. But so far, ES are not explicitly taken into account when calculating and designing offsets (whether regulatory or voluntary). One way to integrate ES in BO is to use the Environmental Impact Assessments' framework, here we propose a logical way to integrate ES at each step of the implementation of the mitigation hierarchy and provide details on the links with existing practice. In our proposal, the inclusion of ES is presented as a way to complement current approaches based on the assessment of habitats/species/ecological functions rather than to replace them. We argue that measures proposed to offset biodiversity losses, in addition to respecting ecological performance standards, should equally be chosen to minimize residual losses of ES. The latter require offsetting by different types of complementary measures. Implementing these recommendations as good practice should strengthen the weight of biodiversity, demonstrate consideration of social equity, and result in better acceptance of development projects and the measures proposed to offset them. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 102
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ant biodiversity and ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes
    Helms, Jackson A.
    Ijelu, Selassie E.
    Wills, Bill D.
    Landis, Douglas A.
    Haddad, Nick M.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 290
  • [42] Consequences of nuclear accidents for biodiversity and ecosystem services
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    Fischer, Joern
    Brandt, Patric
    Wagner, Viktoria
    Kuemmerer, Klaus
    Kuemmerle, Tobias
    Nagel, Anne
    Olsson, Oliver
    Hostert, Patrick
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2012, 5 (02): : 81 - 89
  • [43] Handbook on biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment
    Huge, Jean
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2017, 35 (03) : 268 - 269
  • [44] The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services
    Baumgaertner, Stefan
    NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2007, 20 (01) : 87 - 127
  • [45] Biodiversity and ecosystem services: The Nature Index for Norway
    Aslaksen, Iulie
    Nybo, Signe
    Framstad, Erik
    Garnasjordet, Per Arild
    Skarpaas, Olav
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 : 108 - 116
  • [46] Increased Dependence of Humans on Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity
    Guo, Zhongwei
    Zhang, Lin
    Li, Yiming
    PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (10):
  • [47] Coevolution as an engine of biodiversity and a cornucopia of ecosystem services
    Raguso, Robert A.
    PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, 2021, 3 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [48] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Richard Harrington
    Christian Anton
    Terence P. Dawson
    Francesco de Bello
    Christian K. Feld
    John R. Haslett
    Tatiana Kluvánkova-Oravská
    Areti Kontogianni
    Sandra Lavorel
    Gary W. Luck
    Mark D. A. Rounsevell
    Michael J. Samways
    Josef Settele
    Michalis Skourtos
    Joachim H. Spangenberg
    Marie Vandewalle
    Martin Zobel
    Paula A. Harrison
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2773 - 2790
  • [49] Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
    Bullock, James M.
    Aronson, James
    Newton, Adrian C.
    Pywell, Richard F.
    Rey-Benayas, Jose M.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 541 - 549
  • [50] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ben Ridder
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17 : 781 - 790