Duration analyses of precision agriculture technology adoption: what's influencing farmers' time-to-adoption decisions?

被引:31
|
作者
Ofori, Eric [1 ]
Griffin, Terry [1 ]
Yeager, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
Survival analysis; Embodied knowledge; Information intensive; Commercialization; Hazard rate;
D O I
10.1108/AFR-11-2019-0121
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose Precision technologies have been available at the farm level for decades. Some technologies have been readily adopted, while the adoption of other technologies has been slower. The purpose of this study is to examine the factors influencing farmers' time-to-adoption decisions as duration between year of commercialization of precision agriculture (PA) technologies and year of adoption, at the farm level. Design/methodology/approach Time-to-adoption, which is the difference in years between technologies becoming commercially available and the year of adoption was determined using non-parametric duration analysis, and the impact of specific farm/farmer characteristics on time-to-adoption were estimated using a semi-parametric Cox proportional-hazard (CPH) model, based on a panel dataset of 316 Kansas farms from 2002 to 2018. Findings The findings indicate that, time-to-adoption for embodied-knowledge technologies such as automated guidance and section control were statistically shorter than for information-intensive technologies such as yield monitors, precision soil sampling and variable rate fertility. Duration was indirectly (directly) proportional to commercialization date of embodied-knowledge (information-intensive) technology. More so, time-to-adoption statistically differed among technologies within these two broad categories. Time-to-adoption varies across farm location and between both types of technologies. Millennial farmers are more likely to adopt both types of technologies sooner compared to baby boomers. Net farm income, percentage changes in debt-to-asset ratio, corn to total crop acres and machinery investment had no significant impact on the time-to-adoption for both information-intensive and embodied-knowledge technologies. On the other hand, while variations exist, time-to-adoption of PA technologies is mainly driven by location of farm, generation of farmer, number of workers, years of farming experience, total acres cropped and the cost of crop insurance. Originality/value This study investigates how the financial position of farms, amongst other important factors might influence time-to-adoption of PA technologies. Results are useful to extension personnel and retailers for planning marketing or farm outreach programs taking into consideration that, time-to-adoption differs across regions and by specific characteristics, key amongst them: generation of farmer, number of workers, years of farming experience, total acres cropped and the cost of crop insurance.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 664
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Precision and Digital Agriculture: Adoption of Technologies and Perception of Brazilian Farmers
    Bolfe, Edson Luis
    Jorge, Lucio Andre de Castro
    Sanches, Ieda Del'Arco
    Luchiari Junior, Ariovaldo
    da Costa, Cinthia Cabral
    Victoria, Daniel de Castro
    Inamasu, Ricardo Yassushi
    Grego, Celia Regina
    Ferreira, Victor Rodrigues
    Ramirez, Andrea Restrepo
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12): : 1 - 16
  • [12] Farmers' perception of precision technology: The case of autosteer adoption by cotton farmers
    D'Antoni, Jeremy M.
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    Joo, Hyunjeong
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 87 : 121 - 128
  • [13] Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by sugarcane farmers in the state of São Paulo, Brazil
    Carlos Ivan Mozambani
    Hildo Meirelles de Souza Filho
    Marcela de Mello Brandão Vinholis
    Marcelo José Carrer
    Precision Agriculture, 2023, 24 : 1813 - 1835
  • [14] Predicting Adoption of Innovations by Farmers: What is Different in Smallholder Agriculture?
    Llewellyn, Rick S.
    Brown, Brendan
    APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2020, 42 (01) : 100 - 112
  • [15] Farmers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Adoption of Smart Agriculture Technology in Taiwan
    Chuang, Jui-Hsiung
    Wang, Jiun-Hao
    Liou, Yu-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 8
  • [16] Factors Influencing the Technology Adoption Behaviours of Litchi Farmers in China
    Li, Hui
    Huang, Diejun
    Ma, Qiuzhuo
    Qi, Wene
    Li, Hua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [17] Decisions on optimal adoption time for new technology
    Huang, Yeu-Shiang
    Hsueh, Tsun-Lin
    Zheng, Guang-Hong
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 65 (03) : 388 - 394
  • [19] Timing of precision agriculture technology adoption in US cotton production
    Watcharaanantapong, Pattarawan
    Roberts, Roland K.
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Larson, James A.
    Velandia, Margarita
    English, Burton C.
    Rejesus, Roderick M.
    Wang, Chenggang
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2014, 15 (04) : 427 - 446
  • [20] Determinants of precision agriculture technology adoption in developing countries: a review
    Long Le Hoang Nguyen
    Halibas, Alrence
    Trung Quang Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2023, 37 (01) : 1 - 24