An Investigation into the Cause of Orientation-Sensitivity in Haptic Object Recognition

被引:7
|
作者
Lawson, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Psychol, Liverpool L69 7ZA, Merseyside, England
来源
SEEING AND PERCEIVING | 2011年 / 24卷 / 03期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Haptic; object recognition; orientation; modality; matching; representations; visual; MANUAL OBSTACLE AVOIDANCE; VIEW SENSITIVITY; FAMILIAR OBJECTS; DORSAL STREAM; VIEWPOINT DEPENDENCE; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; ROTATED OBJECTS; DEPTH ROTATION; SHAPE; PICTURE;
D O I
10.1163/187847511X579052
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Object orientation influences visual and haptic recognition differently. This could be caused by the two modalities accessing different object representations or it could be due to differences in how each modality acquires information. These two alternatives were investigated using sequential haptic matching tasks. Matches presented the same object twice. Mismatches presented two similarly-shaped objects. Objects were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated 90 in depth from each other. Experiment 1 manipulated exploration time to test if longer durations weakened orientation-sensitivity by allowing orientation-invariant representations to be extracted. This hypothesis was not supported. Experiment 2 investigated whether the same-orientation advantage resulted from general spatial or motor action cueing rather than the involvement of orientation-specific object representations. To distinguish between these two possibilities, people did a secondary task interleaved within the matching task. They reported the orientation of a fork or spoon which was presented in between the first and second objects. The main axis of the fork/spoon was the same as that of the final object, equating spatial and motor cueing across the same-orientation and orientation-change conditions. Nevertheless, matching remained orientation-sensitive. Together these results suggest that there are separate visual and haptic stored, orientation-specific perceptual representations of objects. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 314
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Haptic Glove for Object Recognition and Hand Motion Detection
    Wang, Xiaojia
    Gu, Yunfei
    Lao, Yingjie
    Fang, Bin
    2020 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC 2020), 2020, : 7192 - 7196
  • [22] Multisensory Interactions between Auditory and Haptic Object Recognition
    Kassuba, Tanja
    Menz, Mareike M.
    Roeder, Brigitte
    Siebner, Hartwig R.
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2013, 23 (05) : 1097 - 1107
  • [23] Object-Shape Recognition Based on Haptic Image
    Gong, Yi
    Wu, Juan
    Wu, Miao
    Han, Xiao
    INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND APPLICATIONS, ICIRA 2017, PT I, 2017, 10462 : 405 - 416
  • [24] Distinct but related abilities for visual and haptic object recognition
    Chow, Jason K.
    Palmeri, Thomas J.
    Gauthier, Isabel
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (05) : 2148 - 2159
  • [25] HAPTIC OBJECT RECOGNITION USING A MULTIFINGERED DEXTEROUS HAND
    ALLEN, PK
    ROBERTS, KS
    PROCEEDINGS - 1989 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL 1-3, 1989, : 342 - 347
  • [26] Orientation congruency effect in object recognition
    Graf, M
    Kaping, D
    Bülthoff, HH
    PERCEPTION, 2003, 32 : 117 - 117
  • [27] Using orientation tokens for object recognition
    Kovalev, VA
    Petrou, M
    Bondar, YS
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 1998, 19 (12) : 1125 - 1132
  • [28] Binding identity and orientation in object recognition
    Irina M. Harris
    Justin A. Harris
    Michael C. Corballis
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 153 - 167
  • [29] Binding identity and orientation in object recognition
    Harris, Irina M.
    Harris, Justin A.
    Corballis, Michael C.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (01) : 153 - 167
  • [30] Age-Related Changes in Haptic Object Recognition: Haptic Performance in Later Life
    Kalisch, T.
    Kattenstroth, J-C
    Kowalewski, R.
    Tegenthoff, M. T.
    Dinse, H. R.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 25 : 38 - 38