Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post First Lumbar Discectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:27
|
作者
Rushton, Alison [1 ]
Wright, Chris [1 ]
Goodwin, Peter [2 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ]
Freemantle, Nick [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Psychol & Social Care, Dept Profess Registrat, Manchester M13 0JA, Lancs, England
[3] UCL Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London NW3 2PF, England
关键词
lumbar discectomy; spinal surgery; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; systematic review; meta-analysis; BEHAVIORAL-GRADED ACTIVITY; DYNAMIC BACK EXERCISES; DISC SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP; POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS; QUALITY; HERNIATION; OUTCOMES; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f0e8f8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective. To evaluate effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention in patients post first lumbar discectomy on clinically relevant outcomes short (3 months) and longer term (12 months). Summary of Background Data. Physiotherapy intervention is recommended post discectomy, although the most beneficial intervention and the effectiveness of physiotherapy management is unclear. Methods. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in English before December 31, 2009 investigating physiotherapy outpatient management of patients (>16 years), post first single level lumbar discectomy were included. Measurements reported on >= 1 outcome of disability, function, and health were included. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed studies for inclusion, and evaluated risk of bias. Quantitative synthesis was conducted on comparable outcomes across studies with similar interventions and no clearly identified overall risk of bias. Results. Sixteen RCTs (1336 participants) from 11 countries were included. Interventions were categorized as intervention versus control/sham, and less versus more intensive comparisons. Eight of 16 trials were evaluated as high risk of bias, 7 as unclear and 1 as low. Six hundred and thirty-five participants were incorporated in the meta-analysis on eight trials. Although evidence from two trials suggested that intervention might reduce disability short-term, and more intensive intervention may be more beneficial than less intensive, the pooled effects (-0.89, 95% CI -1.84 to 0.06 for intervention vs. control/sham; -0.27, 95% CI -0.80 to 0.25 for more vs. less intensive) did not show statistically significant effects. There was no evidence that intervention changes range of movement flexion (ROM) or overall impairment short term, or disability or back pain longer term. There was no evidence that intensity of intervention affects back pain short or longer term, ROM short term, or patients' satisfaction with outcome longer term. Substantial heterogeneity was evident. Conclusion. Inconclusive evidence exists for the effectiveness of outpatient physiotherapy post first lumbar discectomy. Best practice remains unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:E961 / E972
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on Wenxin keli
    Wang, Xiaoyi
    Wang, Ying
    Feng, Xiaoyuan
    Lu, Ying
    Zhang, Yu
    Wang, Wenwen
    Zhu, Wentao
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2016, 10 : 3725 - 3736
  • [42] Yoga for anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cramer, Holger
    Lauche, Romy
    Anheyer, Dennis
    Pilkington, Karen
    de Manincor, Michael
    Dobos, Gustav
    Ward, Lesley
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2018, 35 (09) : 830 - 843
  • [43] Xenon Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Law, Lawrence Siu-Chun
    Lo, Elaine Ah-Gi
    Gan, Tong Joo
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (03): : 678 - 697
  • [44] Garlic for hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiong, X. J.
    Wang, P. Q.
    Li, S. J.
    Li, X. K.
    Zhang, Y. Q.
    Wang, J.
    PHYTOMEDICINE, 2015, 22 (03) : 352 - 361
  • [45] Methotrexate for osteoarthritis: a systematic review meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Queiroz, Ivo
    Pimentel, Tulio
    Ruelas, Mariano Gallo
    Tavares, Arthur Henrique
    Barbosa, Lucas M.
    Defante, Maria L. R.
    Leandro, Giovanna N.
    Monteiro, Arthur Ribeiro
    Pimentel, Fernando Nunes
    INFLAMMOPHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 33 (01) : 135 - 144
  • [46] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Jaaback, Kenneth
    INTRAPERITONEAL CANCER THERAPY, 2007, : 31 - 44
  • [47] Efficacy of acupuncture versus rehabilitation therapy on post-stroke shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhan, Jie
    Luo, Ying
    Mao, Wenjin
    Zhu, Leying
    Xu, Fanfeng
    Wang, Yuan
    Chen, Hongxia
    Zhan, Lechang
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (29) : E34266
  • [48] Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lawler, Patrick R.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 162 (04) : 571 - U25
  • [49] Pre-Procedural Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound-A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis
    Sidiropoulou, Tatiana
    Christodoulaki, Kalliopi
    Siristatidis, Charalampos
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [50] Constraint-induced aphasia therapy in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Yu, Jiadan
    Bao, Yong
    Xie, Qing
    Xu, Yang
    Zhang, Junmei
    Wang, Pu
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):