Comparison of Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte Methods:ethods: Application to GEO orbit

被引:0
|
作者
Benacquista, Remi [1 ]
Pourrouquet, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Varotsou, Athina [1 ]
Mangeret, Renaud [3 ]
Barillot, Catherine [4 ]
Santin, Giovanni [5 ]
Evans, Hugh [5 ]
机构
[1] TRAD, Labege, France
[2] Thales Alenia Space, Cannes, France
[3] Airbus, Toulouse, France
[4] Thales Alenia Space, Toulouse, France
[5] ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands
关键词
FASTRAD; Radiation effects; Ray-Tracing; Reverse Monte-Carlo; Total Ionizing Dose;
D O I
10.1109/RADECS47380.2019.9745642
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Ray-Tracing and Reverse Monte-Carlo are the two most widely used methods to estimate the dose at component level for space applications. The Ray-Tracing method is fast but presents intrinsic limitations while the Reverse Monte-Carlo method is more precise but more time consuming. In the frame of the ESA GTREFF project, a statistical comparison between these two methods has been performed, based on realistic satellite models for GEO orbit and using FASTRAD((R)). Results are presented and analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 249
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of parallelization and performance optimizations for two Ray-tracing applications
    Yang, Chen
    Chen, Yongjian
    Fu, Xiong
    Lim, Chu-Cheow
    Ju, Roy
    20TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION ECMS 2006: MODELLING METHODOLOGIES AND SIMULATION: KEY TECHNOLOGIES IN ACADEMIA AND INDUSTRY, 2006, : 677 - +
  • [32] Comparison of Monte Carlo and Ray-Tracing Dose Calculation for CyberKnife based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI)
    Xu, Q.
    Chen, Y.
    Grimm, J.
    LaCouture, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S265 - S265
  • [33] SOLFAST, a Ray-Tracing Monte-Carlo software for solar concentrating facilities
    Roccia, J. P.
    Piaud, B.
    Coustet, C.
    Caliot, C.
    Guillot, E.
    Flamant, G.
    Delatorre, J.
    EUROTHERM CONFERENCE NO. 95: COMPUTATIONAL THERMAL RADIATION IN PARTICIPATING MEDIA IV, 2012, 369
  • [34] Ray-Tracing Software Comparison for Linear Focusing Solar Collectors
    Osorio, Tiago
    Horta, Pedro
    Larcher, Marco
    Pujol-Nadal, Ramon
    Hertel, Julian
    van Rooyen, De Wet
    Heimsath, Anna
    Schneider, Simon
    Benitez, Daniel
    Frein, Antoine
    Denarie, Alice
    SOLARPACES 2015: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 1734
  • [35] A comparison of ray-tracing software for the design of quadrupole microbeam systems
    Incerti, S
    Smith, RW
    Merchant, M
    Grime, GW
    Méot, F
    Serani, L
    Moretto, P
    Touzeau, C
    Barberet, P
    Habchi, C
    Nguyen, DT
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2005, 231 : 76 - 85
  • [36] REDSoX: Monte-Carlo ray-tracing for a soft X-ray spectroscopy polarimeter
    Gunther, Hans M.
    Egan, Mark
    Heilmann, Ralf K.
    Heine, Sarah N. T.
    Hellickson, Tim
    Frost, Jason
    Marshell, Herman L.
    Schulz, Nobert S.
    Theriault-Shay, Adam
    OPTICS FOR EUV, X-RAY, AND GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY VIII, 2017, 10399
  • [37] Ray-Tracing Application to Mobile Localization in Multipath Indoor Environments
    Tayebi, Abdelhamid
    Gomez, Josefa
    Saez de Adana, Francisco
    Gutierrez, Oscar
    ICEAA: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETICS IN ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 412 - 415
  • [38] Validity of ray-tracing method for the application of noise control in workplaces
    Keränen, J
    Airo, E
    Olkinuora, P
    Hongisto, V
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2003, 89 (05): : 863 - 874
  • [39] Monte Carlo ray-tracing simulations for cold neutron beam guides of CONAS
    Sy Minh Tuan Hoang
    Gwang Min Sun
    Jiseok Kim
    Hani Baek
    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2016, 309 : 207 - 218
  • [40] PoDFluX: A new Monte Carlo ray-tracing model for powder diffraction and fluorescence
    Hansford, Graeme M.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2009, 80 (07):