Configuration of digital and physical infrastructure platforms: Private and public perspectives

被引:15
|
作者
Joglekar, Nitin [1 ]
Anderson, Edward G. Jr Jr [2 ]
Lee, Kyungmin [3 ]
Parker, Geoffrey [4 ]
Settanni, Ettore [5 ]
Srai, Jagjit Singh [5 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Management, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Amer Univ, Kogod Sch Business, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[4] Dartmouth Coll, Thayer Sch Engn, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[5] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, Ctr Int Mfg, Dept Engn, Cambridge, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
digital infrastructure; physical infrastructure; platforms; public policies; supply chains; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; STRATEGIES; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1111/poms.13865
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Investments in infrastructure platforms aim to enhance supply chain performance. We build on network-based models of platform growth to characterize configurations of digital and physical supply chain infrastructure. We define cross-platform effect as the value accrued by a platform on one side of a multiplatform configuration as capability for the opposite side platform evolves. We posit that aligning cross-platform effect across digital and physical infrastructure enhances system outcomes. Our arguments are informed by evidence on private-public partnerships for developing production and distribution infrastructure in the pharmaceutical industry. We identify enablers and inhibitors for cross-platform effects within these data in terms of product and process technology readiness, path-dependent standards creation, organizational alignment, regulatory fragmentation, and the desire towards such infrastructure yielding resilient outcomes. Implications of findings, in shaping analytical and empirical research on managing supply chain infrastructure, at the levels of firms, industries, and public policies are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:4515 / 4528
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustaining platforms as commons: perspectives on participation, infrastructure, and governance
    Poderi, Giacomo
    CODESIGN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COCREATION IN DESIGN AND THE ARTS, 2019, 15 (03): : 243 - 255
  • [22] Urban infrastructure reconfiguration and digital platforms: Who is in control?
    Hodson, Mike
    Mcmeekin, Andrew
    Lockhart, Andy
    ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2024, 50
  • [23] The meaning of digital platforms: Open and closed television infrastructure
    Sanz, Esteve
    Crosbie, Thomas
    POETICS, 2016, 55 : 76 - 89
  • [24] PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IN EASTERN-EUROPE
    MAJOR, I
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 1991, 7 (04) : 76 - 92
  • [25] Public infrastructure and private productivity in the Spanish regions
    Salinas-Jiménez, MD
    JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2004, 26 (01) : 47 - 64
  • [26] Could digital platforms capture the media through infrastructure?
    Nechushtai, Efrat
    JOURNALISM, 2018, 19 (08) : 1043 - 1058
  • [27] Open Cloud Platforms as Enablers of digital Twins of the Infrastructure
    Schuetz, Marc
    ATP MAGAZINE, 2023, (11-12): : 36 - 38
  • [28] Optimal Management of Digital Content on Tiered Infrastructure Platforms
    Du, Anna Ye
    Das, Sanjukta
    Gopal, Ram D.
    Ramesh, Ram
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (04) : 730 - 746
  • [29] Evaluation of Public Private Partnership in Infrastructure Projects
    Loganathan, Karthikeyan
    Najafi, Mohammad
    Kaushal, Vinayak
    Agyemang, Pius
    PIPELINES 2021: PLANNING, 2021, : 151 - 159
  • [30] The case for public-private partnerships in infrastructure
    Murphy, Timothy J.
    CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2008, 51 (01): : 99 - 126