Threshold Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Carbon Emissions Performance From the Perspective of Marketization Level: Implications for the Green Economy

被引:5
|
作者
Hu, Hao [1 ]
Wang, Haiyan [2 ]
Zhao, Shuang [3 ]
Xi, Xun [4 ]
Li, Lan [5 ,6 ]
Shi, Xiaojiao [4 ]
Lu, Yingzi [2 ]
Yu, Jianping [7 ]
Liu, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Li, Jun [8 ]
Zhou, Haiyan [9 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Business Adm, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Henan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Business Adm, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Henan Univ Econ & Law, Res Ctr Henan Econ, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Jimei Univ, Sch Business Adm, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[8] Wenzhou Polytech, Sch Business Adm, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[9] East China Normal Univ, China Ctr Econ Res, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
基金
国家教育部科学基金资助; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
foreign direct investment; carbon intensity; marketization level; threshold effect; Yangtze River Economic Belt; EFFICIENCY; GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708749
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Exploring the path and mechanism of marketization level in the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on carbon emission performance will help to maximize the stimulation effect of foreign investment on green and low-carbon development. This study used the panel data of 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2008 to 2016. A panel threshold model is constructed to explore the non-linear relationship between FDI and carbon emissions performance from the perspective of marketization level. The main conclusions are as follows: First, from the perspective of marketization level, a significant double threshold effect exists between foreign participation and carbon emission intensity, with threshold values of 4.4701 and 9.2516 respectively. Second, as the marketization level increases, the technology spillover effect of FDI increases, and the stimulation effect of foreign participation on carbon intensity decreases significantly, but it does not inhibit carbon intensity, indicating that the overall benefits brought by FDI technology spillovers are still insufficient to offset pollution caused by foreign investment. Third, the eastern region of the Yangtze River Economic Belt has crossed the second threshold. In the central and western regions, the marketization process is relatively slow except for Chongqing, and the regions are still firmly stuck between the first and second thresholds. In response to the conclusions of the empirical research, relevant policy suggestions are put forward from three dimensions, namely, the strategy of introducing foreign investment, construction of the marketization system, and environmental regulation, to achieve low-carbon and green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RETRACTED: Foreign Direct Investment, Regional Innovation, and Green Economic Efficiency: An Empirical Test Based on the Investigation of Intermediary Effect and Threshold Effect (Retracted Article)
    Wu, You-Qun
    Lu, Huai-Xin
    Liao, Xin-Lin
    Liu, Jia-Bao
    Zhu, Jia-Ming
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 2021
  • [42] Threshold effect of foreign direct investment on economic growth in BRICS countries: new evidence from PTAR and PSTAR models
    Maha Kalai
    Hamdi Becha
    Kamel Helali
    International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 2024, 18 : 227 - 258
  • [43] Threshold effect of foreign direct investment on economic growth in BRICS countries: new evidence from PTAR and PSTAR models
    Kalai, Maha
    Becha, Hamdi
    Helali, Kamel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY STUDIES, 2024, 18 (01) : 227 - 258
  • [44] The asymmetric relationship between foreign direct investment, oil prices and carbon emissions: evidence from Gulf Cooperative Council economies
    Ashraf, Sania
    Jithin, P.
    Umar, Zaghum
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [45] Dynamic Evolutionary Analysis of the Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Green Innovation Heterogeneity-From the Perspective of Binary Innovation
    Liu, Luhao
    Zhou, Honglin
    Xie, Jiaping
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [46] The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Capital Formation, Trade, and Economic Growth in a Transition Economy: Evidence from China
    Xu, Gang
    Wang, Ruifang
    GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (02)
  • [47] Green spillovers of outward foreign direct investment on home countries: Evidence from China's province-level data
    Zhou, Yu
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Ye, Bin
    Hou, Bojun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 215 : 829 - 844
  • [48] The carbon emission reduction effect of two-way foreign investment from the perspective of government environmental attention
    Yue, Li
    Yan, Huizhen
    Han, Liang
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [49] Foreign direct investment, sectoral output performance and poverty in Africa: Evidence from panel structural vector autoregressive and threshold regression models
    Chukwu, Anayochukwu Basil
    Adewuyi, Adeolu O.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2024, 29 (03) : 2665 - 2698
  • [50] Does foreign direct investment asymmetrically influence carbon emissions in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from nonlinear panel ARDL approach
    Abdul-Mumuni, Abdallah
    Amoh, John Kwaku
    Mensah, Barbara Deladem
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) : 11861 - 11872