Sustainability Inclusion in Construction Contracts Index

被引:5
|
作者
Mahmoud, Hasan [1 ]
Beheiry, Salwa [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Sharjah, Dept Engn Syst Management, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Amer Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Construction contracts; Sustainability; Sustainable inclusion index; United Arab Emirates (UAE);
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000503
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Despite the interest that environmental prudence has garnered worldwide, the construction industry remains behind in incorporating sustainable concepts in construction contracts and contract administration. Some research promotes the adoption of sustainability clauses into construction contracts, and some of the standard contract forms include sections on sustainability. However, there is no research to date that analyzes the current state of adopting sustainable practices and techniques in contractual terms. There are also no specific measures tailored to the different types of construction projects, and owner/developers have no tools to assess sustainability components of their construction contracts. Therefore, this research investigated the degree of incorporation of sustainability clauses in construction contracts in the United Arab Emirates. Sustainable practices were collected from the literature and validated via interviews with 5 construction organizations and surveys of 11 more to develop the Sustainability Inclusion in Construction Contracts Index (SICCI) in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). The SICCI was designed and validated to measure the inclusion of sustainable practices in contractual terms typically used by the construction industry. The resulting index was applied as a case study to a residential construction project in the United Arab Emirates. The project team found the index very usable and the project scored a 70% inclusion rate in contractual terms. Inclusion assessment is the first step in true adoption of sustainable development concepts in construction projects. This paper recommends further adoption of this tool in construction organizations to promote sustainable practices.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COLLABORATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
    Woodhead, Bill
    Davis, Theron
    Walker, Robert
    ALBERTA LAW REVIEW, 2023, 61 (02) : 307 - 352
  • [42] Interpretation of construction contracts
    Thomas, H.Randolph, 1600, (120):
  • [43] An Empathetic Added Sustainability Index (EASI) for cementitious based construction materials
    Coppola, L.
    Coffetti, D.
    Crotti, E.
    Gazzaniga, G.
    Pastore, T.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 220 : 475 - 482
  • [44] A composite index to measure sustainability of supply chain management in construction companies
    Cataldo, Ieva
    Banaitiene, Nerija
    Banaitis, Audrius
    E & M EKONOMIE A MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [45] An Index to Measure Sustainability of a Business Project in the Construction Industry: Lithuanian Case
    Dobrovolskiene, Nomeda
    Tamosiuniene, Rima
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (01)
  • [46] What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for european firms
    Ziegler, Andreas
    Schroeder, Michael
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (04) : 848 - 856
  • [47] The inclusion of environmental performance in transport contracts
    Bjorklund, Maria
    Forslund, Helena
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2013, 24 (02) : 214 - 227
  • [48] Market Reactions to Firms' Inclusion in the Sustainability Index: Further Evidence of TCFD Framework Adoption
    Liu, Wu-Po
    Lo, Li-Ya
    Huang, Wan-Ci
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 40 (04) : 799 - 811
  • [49] Does the Stock Market Value Inclusion in a Sustainability Index? Evidence from Borsa Istanbul
    Yilmaz, Mustafa K.
    Aksoy, Mine
    Tatoglu, Ekrem
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [50] THE SOCIAL FUNCTION OF CONTRACTS AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY
    Poli, Luciana Costa
    Hazan, Bruno Ferraz
    REVISTA DIREITO E LIBERDADE, 2013, 15 (01) : 171 - 193