Content and construct validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I for children

被引:8
|
作者
Restrepo, Claudia C. [1 ]
Suarez, Natasha [1 ]
Moratto, Nadia [2 ]
Manrique, Ruben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ CES, CES LPH Res Grp, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Univ CES, Psychol Fac, Medellin, Colombia
关键词
children; diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders; factor analysis; temporomandibular disorders; validation; PAIN INTENSITY; TIME PERCEPTION; FIT INDEXES; SELF-REPORT; PREVALENCE; ADOLESCENTS; DELPHI; CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; RDC/TMD;
D O I
10.1111/joor.12957
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective To perform the content and construct validation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I, for children 7-11 years old. Materials and Methods A Delphi process was used to perform the content validity of the DC/TMD Axis I. One hundred eighty-nine 7- to 11-year-old children were assessed with the adapted instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to investigate construct validity of the DC/TMD for children. A baseline one-factor model was compared against a two-factor (Model 2) and a seven-factor (Model 3) models based on the original DC/TMD. Root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), chi-square, change in chi-square and Cronbach's alpha were used to analyse the data. All analyses were performed in STATA (c) version 13.0. Results Items of the DC/TMD were reduced, "history time" was changed to 2 weeks, pain intensity was assessed through a face scale, and language was adapted to be better understood by children. The amount of muscle pressure was maintained as in the original DC/TMD Axis I. The CFA led to a two- and a seven-factor model, with good fit. The internal consistency of Model 2 was .91 and of Model 3, .94. Conclusion The results of this study provide evidence to support a seven-factor representation of the DC/TMD Axis I for 7- to 11-year-old children, as well as a two-factor structure. Such findings will begin to provide researchers with confidence in the properties of this instrument when considering its inclusion in clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 819
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. II: Reliability of Axis I Diagnoses and Selected Clinical Measures
    Look, John O.
    John, Mike T.
    Tai, Fang
    Huggins, Kimberly H.
    Lenton, Patricia A.
    Truelove, Edmond L.
    Ohrbach, Richard
    Anderson, Gary C.
    Schiffman, Eric L.
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2010, 24 (01): : 25 - 34
  • [22] Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD): interexaminer reliability of the Finnish version of Axis I clinical diagnoses
    Leskinen, J.
    Suvinen, T.
    Teerijoki-Oksa, T.
    Kemppainen, P.
    Napankangas, R.
    Alstergren, P.
    Le Bell, Y.
    Forssell, H.
    Myllykangas, R.
    Tolvanen, M.
    Doepel, M.
    Sipila, K.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 44 (07) : 493 - 499
  • [23] Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for children and adolescents: An international Delphi study-Part 1-Development of Axis I
    Rongo, Roberto
    Ekberg, EwaCarin
    Nilsson, Ing-Marie
    Al-Khotani, Amal
    Alstergren, Per
    Conti, Paulo Cesar Rodrigues
    Durham, Justin
    Goulet, Jean-Paul
    Hirsch, Christian
    Kalaykova, Stanimira I.
    Kapos, Flavia P.
    Komiyama, Osamu
    Koutris, Michail
    List, Thomas
    Lobbezoo, Frank
    Ohrbach, Richard
    Peck, Christopher C.
    Restrepo, Claudia
    Rodrigues, Maria Joao
    Sharma, Sonia
    Svensson, Peter
    Visscher, Corine M.
    Wahlund, Kerstin
    Michelotti, Ambra
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 48 (07) : 836 - 845
  • [24] Is It Time to Reconsider the Diagnostic Construct Validity of Depressive Disorders for Young Children?
    Madigan, Sheri
    Korczak, Daphne J.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2023, 177 (10) : 1008 - 1010
  • [25] Translating the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders into German: Evaluation of content and process
    John, MT
    Hirsch, C
    Reiber, T
    Dworkin, SF
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2006, 20 (01): : 43 - 52
  • [26] Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into Malay: Evaluation of content and process
    Khoo, Suan-Phaik
    Yap, Adrian U. Jin
    Chan, Yiong Huak
    Bulgiba, Awang M.
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2008, 22 (02): : 131 - 138
  • [27] Expanding the taxonomy of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders
    Peck, C. C.
    Goulet, J-P
    Lobbezoo, F.
    Schiffman, E. L.
    Alster-Gren, P.
    Anderson, G. C.
    De Leeuw, R.
    Jensen, R.
    Michelotti, A.
    Ohrbach, R.
    Petersson, A.
    List, T.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 2 - 23
  • [28] RESEARCH DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS
    LERESCHE, L
    OROFACIAL PAIN AND TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS, 1995, 21 : 189 - 203
  • [29] A Focus on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders
    Sessle, Barry J.
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2009, 23 (01): : 5 - 6
  • [30] Evolution of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders
    Sessle, Barry J.
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL PAIN, 2010, 24 (01): : 5 - 5