In vitro chemoresistance and biomarker profiles are unique for histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:53
|
作者
Cloven, NG
Kyshtoobayeva, A
Burger, RA
Yu, IR
Fruehauf, JP
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Div Gynecol Oncol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Oncotech Inc, Irvine, CA 92614 USA
关键词
chemoresistance; biomarkers; ovarian cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.030
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine whether there is a relationship between histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer and chemoresistance, we evaluated ovarian carcinomas of six histologic subtypes and correlated histology with in vitro drug response. Biomarker profiles (p53, Her-2 neu, and EGER) were also evaluated to deter-mine if their expression patterns were associated with histology. Methods. In vitro drug response profiles for different histologic subsets of epithelial ovarian carcinomas exposed to standard relevant chemotherapy agents were determined in the Extreme Drug Resistance assay (EDR). Immunohistochemistry techniques were employed to determine biomarker expression. Results. Of 5195 referred serial cases of epithelial ovarian cancer, there were 2660 papillary serous, 303 endometrioid, 142 mucinous, 102 clear cell, 952 undifferentiated carcinomas, and 42 tumors of low malignant potential. For the samples as a whole, the incidences of extreme drug resistance to the tested chemotherapeutic agents were cisplatin 10%, carboplatin 16%, cyclophosphamide 16%, doxorubicin 40%, gemcitabine 21%, paclitaxel 22%, and topotecan 13%. When compared to papillary serous tumors, mucinous tumors were more frequently resistant to cisplatin (10% vs. 18%) but less frequently resistant to topotecan (13% vs. 5%) and doxorubicin (42% vs. 16%). Endometrioid tumors were less resistant to cisplatin (10% vs. 6%) and doxorubicin (42% vs. 20%). Clear cell and undifferentiated tumors had the lowest rates of EDR to paclitaxel (13% and 18%) and cyclophosphamide (7% and 11%), while borderline tumors showed high rates of EDR to these agents (52% and 63%, respectively). With respect to biomarker profiles, mP53 was detected in 46%, Her-2 neu in 16%, and EGFR in 30% of the cases evaluated. As compared to all other subtypes, clear cell carcinomas bad significantly higher Her-2 neu expression (19%). Relative to papillary serous carcinomas, borderline tumors exhibited significantly lower rates of mP53 expression (60% vs. 17%). Conclusions. We found significant differences in the frequencies of extreme drug resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and biomarker expression among histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. The data collected in this investigation may provide a guide for stratification of patients entering clinical trials based on histology and biomarker expression. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NANOG regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer
    Qin, Shan
    Li, Yanfang
    Cao, Xuexia
    Du, Jiexian
    Huang, Xianghua
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2017, 37
  • [42] Strategies to overcome chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer: Navigating beyond challenges
    Nguyen, Que Thanh Thanh
    Kim, Jihye
    Yoo, Hee Chan
    Lee, Eun-Ju
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2025, 210
  • [43] Overexpression of Cathepsin L is associated with chemoresistance and invasion of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Sui, Hongying
    Shi, Caixia
    Yan, Zhipeng
    Wu, Mei
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (29) : 45995 - 46001
  • [44] Histologic transformation of benign endometriosis to early epithelial ovarian cancer
    DelaCuesta, RS
    Eichhorn, JH
    Rice, LW
    Fuller, AF
    Nikrui, N
    Goff, BA
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 60 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [45] Expression of RET finger protein predicts chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer
    Horio, Maiko
    Kato, Takuya
    Mii, Shinji
    Enomoto, Atsushi
    Asai, Masato
    Asai, Naoya
    Murakumo, Yoshiki
    Shibata, Kiyosumi
    Kikkawa, Fumitaka
    Takahashi, Masahide
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2012, 1 (02): : 218 - 229
  • [46] Biomarker conservation in primary and metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tewari, KS
    Kyshtoobayeva, AS
    Mehta, RS
    Yu, IR
    Burger, RA
    DiSaia, PJ
    Fruehauf, JP
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) : 130 - 136
  • [47] Biomarker discovery in epithelial ovarian cancer by genomic approaches
    Mok, Samuel C.
    Elias, Kevin M.
    wong, K-Kwok Wong
    Ho, Kae
    Bonome, Tomas
    Birrer, Michael J.
    ADVANCES IN CANCER RESEARCH, VOL 96, 2007, 96 : 1 - 22
  • [48] Progranulin as a prognostic biomarker of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Fitzgerald, Sharon
    Yu, Minshu
    Hays, John
    Di Santo, Nicola
    Havrilesky, Laura
    Kohn, Elise
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73 (08)
  • [49] Utility of osteopontin as a biomarker in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
    Brakora, KA
    Lee, H
    Yusuf, R
    Sullivan, L
    Harris, A
    Colella, T
    Seiden, MV
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 93 (02) : 361 - 365
  • [50] Plasma microRNA profiles: identification of novel microRNA as a biomarker for chemoresistance in gastric cancer
    Nishibeppu, Keiji
    Komatsu, Shuhei
    Imamura, Taisuke
    Kiuchi, Jun
    Kosuga, Toshiyuki
    Okamoto, Kazuma
    Konishi, Hirotaka
    Kubota, Takeshi
    Shiozaki, Atsushi
    Fujiwara, Hitoshi
    Otsuji, Eigo
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 785 - 785