In vitro chemoresistance and biomarker profiles are unique for histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:53
|
作者
Cloven, NG
Kyshtoobayeva, A
Burger, RA
Yu, IR
Fruehauf, JP
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Div Gynecol Oncol, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Oncotech Inc, Irvine, CA 92614 USA
关键词
chemoresistance; biomarkers; ovarian cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.030
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine whether there is a relationship between histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer and chemoresistance, we evaluated ovarian carcinomas of six histologic subtypes and correlated histology with in vitro drug response. Biomarker profiles (p53, Her-2 neu, and EGER) were also evaluated to deter-mine if their expression patterns were associated with histology. Methods. In vitro drug response profiles for different histologic subsets of epithelial ovarian carcinomas exposed to standard relevant chemotherapy agents were determined in the Extreme Drug Resistance assay (EDR). Immunohistochemistry techniques were employed to determine biomarker expression. Results. Of 5195 referred serial cases of epithelial ovarian cancer, there were 2660 papillary serous, 303 endometrioid, 142 mucinous, 102 clear cell, 952 undifferentiated carcinomas, and 42 tumors of low malignant potential. For the samples as a whole, the incidences of extreme drug resistance to the tested chemotherapeutic agents were cisplatin 10%, carboplatin 16%, cyclophosphamide 16%, doxorubicin 40%, gemcitabine 21%, paclitaxel 22%, and topotecan 13%. When compared to papillary serous tumors, mucinous tumors were more frequently resistant to cisplatin (10% vs. 18%) but less frequently resistant to topotecan (13% vs. 5%) and doxorubicin (42% vs. 16%). Endometrioid tumors were less resistant to cisplatin (10% vs. 6%) and doxorubicin (42% vs. 20%). Clear cell and undifferentiated tumors had the lowest rates of EDR to paclitaxel (13% and 18%) and cyclophosphamide (7% and 11%), while borderline tumors showed high rates of EDR to these agents (52% and 63%, respectively). With respect to biomarker profiles, mP53 was detected in 46%, Her-2 neu in 16%, and EGFR in 30% of the cases evaluated. As compared to all other subtypes, clear cell carcinomas bad significantly higher Her-2 neu expression (19%). Relative to papillary serous carcinomas, borderline tumors exhibited significantly lower rates of mP53 expression (60% vs. 17%). Conclusions. We found significant differences in the frequencies of extreme drug resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and biomarker expression among histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. The data collected in this investigation may provide a guide for stratification of patients entering clinical trials based on histology and biomarker expression. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomarker and in vitro chemoresistance profiles of undifferentiated ovarian cancers
    Chan, J. K.
    Kapp, D. S.
    Mechetner, E.
    Yu, I.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [2] Biomarker and in vitro chemoresistance profiles of undifferentiated ovarian cancers
    Chan, J. K.
    Kapp, D. S.
    Mechetner, E.
    Yu, I. R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 107 (02) : 377 - 378
  • [3] Proteomic analysis reflects different histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Jia, Lin
    Zhang, Hui
    Qu, Xun
    Deng, Biping
    Kong, Beihua
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2012, 78 (03) : 407 - 409
  • [4] CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF INTRINSIC CHEMORESISTANCE/CHEMOSENSITIVITY AND BIOMARKER PROFILES IN OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS
    Sedlakova, I.
    Laco, J.
    Brigulova, K.
    Cervinka, M.
    Tosner, J.
    Student, V.
    Spacek, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 : 1660 - 1660
  • [5] Characterization of fusion genes in common and rare epithelial ovarian cancer histologic subtypes
    Earp, Madalene A.
    Raghavan, Rama
    Li, Qian
    Dai, Junqiang
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Cunningham, Julie M.
    Natanzon, Yanina
    Kalli, Kimberly R.
    Hou, Xiaonan
    Weroha, S. John
    Haluska, Paul
    Lawrenson, Kate
    Gayther, Simon A.
    Wang, Chen
    Goode, Ellen L.
    Fridley, Brooke L.
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (29) : 46891 - 46899
  • [6] Incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer according to histologic subtypes in Korea, 1999 to 2012
    Kim, Se Ik
    Lim, Myong Cheol
    Lim, Jiwon
    Won, Young-Joo
    Seo, Sang-Soo
    Kang, Sokbom
    Park, Sang-Yoon
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01)
  • [7] DIFFERENCE IN RESPONSE TO HORMONOTHERAPY IN EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER BY HISTOLOGIC SUBTYPES: CASE SERIES
    Gomez-Garcia, E.
    Lara-Torres, C.
    Gomez-Plata, E.
    Cabrera-Galeana, P.
    Barrera-Franco, J.
    Dolores, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (09) : 373 - 373
  • [8] MR imaging of epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined model to predict histologic subtypes
    Qian, LuoDan
    Ren, JiaLiang
    Liu, AiShi
    Gao, Yang
    Hao, FenE
    Zhao, Lei
    Wu, Hui
    Niu, GuangMing
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (11) : 5815 - 5825
  • [9] MR imaging of epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined model to predict histologic subtypes
    LuoDan Qian
    JiaLiang Ren
    AiShi Liu
    Yang Gao
    FenE Hao
    Lei Zhao
    Hui Wu
    GuangMing Niu
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 5815 - 5825
  • [10] Histologic subtypes and laterality of primary epithelial ovarian tumors
    Boger-Megiddo, I
    Weiss, NS
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (01) : 80 - 83