A Bibliometric Review of Open Innovation: Setting a Research Agenda

被引:513
|
作者
Randhawa, Krithika [1 ]
Wilden, Ralf [2 ]
Hohberger, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Newcastle Business Sch, Strategy, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; INBOUND OPEN INNOVATION; STRATEGY-AS-PRACTICE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE; COCITATION ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; AUTHOR COCITATION;
D O I
10.1111/jpim.12312
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Through an objective, systematic, and comprehensive review of the literature on open innovation (OI), this article identifies gaps in existing research, and provides recommendations on how hitherto unused or underused organizational, management, and marketing theories can be applied to advance the field. This study adopts a novel approach by combining two complementary bibliometric methods of co-citation analysis and text mining of 321 journal articles on OI that enables a robust empirical analysis of the intellectual streams and key concepts underpinning OI. Results reveal that researchers do not sufficiently draw on theoretical perspectives external to the field to examine multiple facets of OI. Research also seems confined to innovation-specific journals with its focus restricted to a select few OI issues, thereby exerting limited influence on the wider business community. This study reveals three distinct areas within OI research: (1) firm-centric aspects of OI, (2) management of OI networks, and (3) role of users and communities in OI. Thus far, studies have predominantly investigated the firm-centric aspects of OI, with a particular focus on the role of knowledge, technology, and R&D from the innovating firm's perspective, while the other two areas remain relatively under-researched. Further gaps in the literature emerge that present avenues for future research, namely to: (1) develop a more comprehensive understanding of OI by including diverse perspectives (users, networks, and communities), (2) direct increased attention to OI strategy formulation and implementation, and (3) enhance focus on customer co-creation and conceptualize open service innovation. Marketing (e.g., service-dominant logic), organizational behavior (e.g., communities of practice), and management (e.g., dynamic capabilities) offer suitable theoretical lenses and/or concepts to address these gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 772
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Organizational learning and innovation: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda
    Hael, Mohammed
    Belhaj, Fozi Ali
    Zhang, Honglie
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (11)
  • [22] Interorganizational network and innovation: a bibliometric study and proposed research agenda
    Dagnino, Giovanni Battista
    Levanti, Gabriella
    Mina, Anna
    Picone, Pasquale Massimo
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2015, 30 (3-4) : 354 - 377
  • [24] Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda
    Livio Cricelli
    Michele Grimaldi
    Silvia Vermicelli
    Review of Managerial Science, 2022, 16 : 1269 - 1310
  • [25] Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda
    Cricelli, Livio
    Grimaldi, Michele
    Vermicelli, Silvia
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 16 (05) : 1269 - 1310
  • [26] Frugal innovation: A review and research agenda
    Hossain, Mokter
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 182 : 926 - 936
  • [27] Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda
    Corbo, Leonardo
    Kraus, Sascha
    Vlacic, Bozidar
    Dabic, Marina
    Caputo, Andrea
    Pellegrini, Massimiliano M.
    TECHNOVATION, 2023, 122
  • [28] Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
    Niklas Gudowsky
    European Journal of Futures Research, 2021, 9
  • [29] A Research Agenda on Open Data Impact Process for Open Innovation
    Corrales-Garay, Diego
    Ortiz-De-Urbina-Criado, Marta
    Mora-Valentin, Eva-Maria
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 34696 - 34705
  • [30] Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
    Gudowsky, Niklas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FUTURES RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (01)