Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section for failure of second stage of labour

被引:24
|
作者
Jongen, VHWM [1 ]
Halfwerk, MGC [1 ]
Brouwer, WK [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09939.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the outcome of subsequent labour in primiparous women after a caesarean section for delay in descent in the second stage of labour in cephalic presentations with or without trial of instrumental vaginal delivery. Design Retrospective follow up study. Setting Medical Centre Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. Participants All primiparous parturients who delivered after prior caesarean section during the second stage of labour in the period 1986-1998. Methods Data concerning the outcome of the first subsequent delivery were gathered from delivery notes and patients charts. The group of women was subdivided into those with or without trial of instrumental vaginal delivery during the previous labour. Results Of 132 women, 29 (22%) underwent a planned repeat caesarean section. Of the 103 women who were allowed a trial of labour, 82 (80%) were successful in having a vaginal delivery, and 21 (20%) had a second caesarean section. Of the 74 women with a failed trial of instrumental delivery during the previous labour, 19 had a planned repeat caesarean section and 41 of the remaining 55 (75%) had a successful trial of labour. Conclusions In women with a cephalic presentation who had an arrest of descent in the second stage of labour during their first delivery, the chances of vaginal delivery in their next pregnancy are high, even after a failed instrumented vaginal delivery, and a trial of labour can usually be pursued.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1081
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The current management of vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery
    Varma, Rajesh
    OBSTETRICIAN & GYNAECOLOGIST, 2007, 9 (03): : 209 - 210
  • [32] Prediction of vaginal delivery following caesarean section for failure to progress based on the initial aberrant labour pattern
    Hopkins, F
    Raine-Fenning, N
    Gee, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 101 (02) : 121 - 123
  • [33] Quantification of risk of emergency caesarean during labour after one previous caesarean section
    Pearson, G. A.
    Eckford, S. D.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 33 (07) : 692 - 694
  • [34] Caesarean Delivery in the Second Stage of Labour at a Tertiary Care Hospital
    Smriti Bhargava
    Nupur Hooja
    Manisha Kala
    Premlata Mital
    Kritika Tulani
    Surabhi Arora
    Bhomraj Kumavat
    Shivani Gupta
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2019, 69 : 558 - 560
  • [35] Caesarean Delivery in the Second Stage of Labour at a Tertiary Care Hospital
    Bhargava, Smriti
    Hooja, Nupur
    Kala, Manisha
    Mital, Premlata
    Tulani, Kritika
    Arora, Surabhi
    Kumavat, Bhomraj
    Gupta, Shivani
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2019, 69 (06): : 558 - 560
  • [36] Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section
    Turner, MJA
    Agnew, G
    Langan, H
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (06) : 729 - 732
  • [37] Misoprostol for Labour Induction after Previous Caesarean Section - Forever a "No Go"?
    Rath, W.
    Tsikouras, P.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2015, 75 (11) : 1140 - 1147
  • [39] Uterine Rupture after Vaginal Birth in Patients with Previous Caesarean Section
    Manzoor, Ayesha
    Sattar, Faiza
    Zahoor, Asim
    Zahoor, Umer
    Zahoor, Hafiz Ali
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (01): : 634 - 635
  • [40] Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes in patients with previous second stage caesarean section
    Niphadkar, M.
    Vaithilingam, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 : 143 - 143