Atrial defibrillation threshold as a novel predictor of clinical outcome of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

被引:13
|
作者
Komatsu, Yuki [1 ]
Uno, Kikuya [1 ]
Otomo, Kiyoshi [1 ]
Nagata, Yasutoshi [1 ]
Taniguchi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Ogura, Kazuyoshi [1 ]
Egami, Yasuyuki [1 ]
Takayama, Kei [1 ]
Kakita, Ken [1 ]
Iesaka, Yoshito [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsuchiura Kyodo Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Ctr Cardiovasc, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan
来源
EUROPACE | 2011年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Predictor; Procedural endpoint; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; INTERNAL CARDIOVERSION; INTRAVENOUS SOTALOL; TERMINATION; SUBSTRATE; ORGANIZATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euq357
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently performed with different procedural endpoints. When AF did not terminate during ablation procedure, electrical cardioversion was performed at different defibrillation threshold (DFT) according to AF characteristics and atrial electrophysiologic substrates. We sought to evaluate the impact of atrial DFT after catheter ablation for persistent AF on clinical outcome. Methods and results We studied 128 patients with persistent AF (age 63 +/- 9 years, 106 men). After completion of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, the left atrial substrate ablation was performed until AF terminated or all identified complex fractionated electrograms were eliminated. If AF did not terminate during ablation, an internal cardioversion protocol was started at 5 J and was increased incrementally in 5 J steps until successful cardioversion was accomplished. Procedural AF termination was achieved in 50 patients (Group A). Atrial fibrillation was terminated by cardioversion with DFT <= 10 J in 47 patients (Group B) and with DFT > 10 J in 31 patients (Group C). At 14 +/- 7 follow-up months after 1.3 +/- 0.5 sessions, 47 (94%) Group A patients, 42 (89%) Group B patients, and 14 (45%) Group C patients remained in sinus rhythm. In multivariate analysis of Group B and Group C, DFT (hazard ratio 5.54, P < 0.001) and AF duration (hazard ratio 3.74, P = 0.011) were independent predictors of recurrent arrhythmia. Conclusion When AF does not terminate after the completion of predetermined stepwise ablation, further extensive ablation to terminate AF might be unnecessary if the AF can be successfully terminated by electrical cardioversion at low DFT.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical outcome of very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
    Hsieh, MH
    Tai, CT
    Tsai, CF
    Lin, WS
    Lin, YK
    Tsao, HM
    Huang, JL
    Ueng, KC
    Yu, WC
    Chan, P
    Ding, YA
    Chang, MS
    Chen, SA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (06) : 598 - 601
  • [32] Left Atrial Ejection Force as a Predictor of Outcome After Catheter Ablation in an Early Stage of Atrial Fibrillation
    Kishima, Hideyuki
    Mine, Takanao
    Takahashi, Satoshi
    Ashida, Kenki
    Ishihara, Masaharu
    Masuyama, Tohru
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [33] Adjusted Left Atrial Emptying Fraction as a Predictor of Procedural Outcome after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    Im, Sung Il
    Na, Jin Oh
    Kim, Sun Won
    Choi, Cheol Ung
    Kim, Jin Won
    Yong, Hwan Seok
    Kim, Eung Ju
    Rha, Seung-Woon
    Park, Chang Gyu
    Seo, Hong Seog
    Oh, Dong Joo
    Lim, Hong Euy
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2015, 42 (03): : 216 - 225
  • [34] Long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation
    Wang Yubing
    Xu Yanping
    Ling Zhiyu
    Chen Weijie
    Su Li
    Du Huaan
    Xiao Peilin
    Liu Zengzhang
    Yin Yuehui
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (29)
  • [35] Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Termination on Clinical Outcome after Ablation in Relation to the Duration of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Komatsu, Yuki
    Taniguchi, Hiroshi
    Miyazaki, Shinsuke
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    Kusa, Shigeki
    Uchiyama, Takashi
    Kakita, Ken
    Kakuta, Tsunekazu
    Hachiya, Hitoshi
    Iesaka, Yoshito
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (12): : 1436 - 1443
  • [36] Atrial signal analysis and defibrillation threshold assessment in chronic persistent and reinduced atrial fibrillation
    Boriani, G
    Bartolini, P
    Biffi, M
    Calcagnini, G
    Camanini, C
    Corazza, I
    Zannoli, R
    Barbaro, V
    Branzi, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (05) : 449 - 454
  • [37] Pearls and Pitfalls in Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Lo, Li-Wei
    Lin, Yenn-Jiang
    Chang, Shih-Lin
    Hu, Yu-Feng
    Chung, Fa-Po
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 80 (02) : 306 - 313
  • [38] Early recurrence is a predictor of recurrence after catheter ablation in the patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
    Ito, Y.
    Igarashi, M.
    Yamasaki, H.
    Kuroki, K.
    Machino, T.
    Murakoshi, N.
    Sekiguchi, Y.
    Aonuma, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 100 - 100
  • [39] Five-Year Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Termination of Atrial Fibrillation as a Procedural Endpoint
    Scherr, Daniel
    Khairy, Paul
    Miyazaki, Shinsuke
    Aurillac-Lavignolle, Valerie
    Pascale, Patrizio
    Wilton, Stephen B.
    Ramoul, Khaled
    Komatsu, Yuki
    Roten, Laurent
    Jadidi, Amir
    Linton, Nick
    Pedersen, Michala
    Daly, Matthew
    O'Neill, Mark
    Knecht, Sebastien
    Weerasooriya, Rukshen
    Rostock, Thomas
    Manninger, Martin
    Cochet, Hubert
    Shah, Ashok J.
    Yeim, Sunthareth
    Denis, Arnaud
    Derval, Nicolas
    Hocini, Meleze
    Sacher, Frederic
    Haissaguerre, Michel
    Jais, Pierre
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 8 (01): : 18 - U38
  • [40] Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in a patient with dextrocardia
    XUE ZengmingSANG CaihuaDONG Jianzeng MA Changsheng Department of CardiologyBeijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijing China
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2012, (10) : 1839 - 1840