Significance of Primary Tumor Volume and T-stage on Prognosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy

被引:71
|
作者
Chen, Chuanben [1 ]
Fei, Zhaodong [1 ]
Pan, Jianji [1 ]
Bai, Penggang [1 ]
Chen, Lisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; primary tumor volume; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LOCAL-CONTROL; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; NECK; HEAD; CANCER;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyq242
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the primary tumor volume on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Methods: Between August 2003 and April 2005, 112 patients with Stage I-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy were included. Measurement of the primary tumor volume was based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment. A receiver operating characteristics curve was used to determine the best cut-off point of the primary tumor volume. Results: The mean primary tumor volume for 112 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma was 33.9 +/- 28.7 ml. Within the framework of UICC T-staging, all patients were divided into four groups according to the primary tumor volume. We call it the volume stage (V1<15.65 ml, V2 = 15.65-24.25 ml, V3 = 24.25-50.55 ml and V4 >50.55 ml). The 5-year overall survival rates for V1, V2, V3 and V4 were 88.5, 83.3, 82.4 and 54.5% (P = 0.014), respectively. The cumulative survival curves for V1, V2 and V3 were very close, but clearly separated from V4. In addition, Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis showed that a primary tumor volume >50 ml was an independent risk factor for radiotherapy (risk ratio = 3.485, P = 0.025). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the primary tumor volume had significantly impacted on the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We proposed that the primary tumor volume should be considered as an additional stage indicator in the new revision of the clinical stage of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 542
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic value of total tumor volume in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Liang, Shao-Bo
    Teng, Jian-Jian
    Hu, Xue-Feng
    Yang, Xing-Li
    Luo, Min
    Fang, Xiao-Na
    Liu, Dong-Sheng
    Chen, Yong
    Fu, Li-Wu
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [22] Modern treatment outcomes for early T-stage oropharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy at a tertiary care institution
    Di Gravio, Eric J.
    Lang, Pencilla
    Kim, Hugh Andrew Jinwook
    Chinnery, Tricia
    Mundi, Neil
    MacNeil, S. Danielle
    Mendez, Adrian
    Yoo, John
    Fung, Kevin
    Mymryk, Joe S.
    Barrett, John W.
    Read, Nancy
    Venkatesan, Varagur
    Kuruvilla, Sara
    Mendez, Lucas C.
    Winquist, Eric
    Mitchell, Sylvia
    Mattonen, Sarah A.
    Nichols, Anthony C.
    Palma, David A.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [23] Update report of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypothesis of the optimal margin
    Lin, Shaojun
    Pan, Jianji
    Han, Lu
    Guo, Qiaojuan
    Hu, Cairong
    Zong, Jingfeng
    Zhang, Xiuchun
    Lu, Jiade Jay
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (03) : 385 - 389
  • [24] The Impact of Reduced-Volume, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy on Disease Control in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Lin, Yu-Wei
    Chen, Chia-Chun
    Lin, Li-Ching
    Lee, Steve P.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [25] Modern treatment outcomes for early T-stage oropharyngeal cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy at a tertiary care institution
    Eric J. Di Gravio
    Pencilla Lang
    Hugh Andrew Jinwook Kim
    Tricia Chinnery
    Neil Mundi
    S. Danielle MacNeil
    Adrian Mendez
    John Yoo
    Kevin Fung
    Joe S. Mymryk
    John W. Barrett
    Nancy Read
    Varagur Venkatesan
    Sara Kuruvilla
    Lucas C. Mendez
    Eric Winquist
    Sylvia Mitchell
    Sarah A. Mattonen
    Anthony C. Nichols
    David A. Palma
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [26] Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric study
    White, Peter
    Chan, Kit Chi
    Cheng, Ka Wai
    Chan, Ka Yiu
    Chau, Ming Chun
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (03) : 532 - 545
  • [27] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Salvage of Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Qiu, Sufang
    Lin, Shaojun
    Tham, Ivan W. K.
    Pan, Jianji
    Lu, Jun
    Lu, Jiade J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02): : 676 - 683
  • [28] The current status of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Lu, Heming
    Yao, Min
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2008, 34 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [29] A split-organ delineation approach for dose optimisation for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Chau, R. M. C.
    Leung, S. F.
    Kam, M. K. M.
    Cheung, K. Y.
    Kwan, W. H.
    Yu, K. H.
    Chiu, S. K. W.
    Chan, A. T. C.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 20 (02) : 134 - 141
  • [30] Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Li, Xingzhe
    Kitpanit, Sarin
    Lee, Anna
    Mah, Dennis
    Sine, Kevin
    Sherman, Eric J.
    Dunn, Lara A.
    Michel, Loren S.
    Fetten, James
    Zakeri, Kaveh
    Yu, Yao
    Chen, Linda
    Kang, Jung Julie
    Gelblum, Daphna Y.
    McBride, Sean M.
    Tsai, Chiaojung J.
    Riaz, Nadeem
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (06)