Integrated system evaluation of nuclear fuel cycle options in China combined with an analytical MCDM framework

被引:21
|
作者
Gao, Ruxing [1 ]
Nam, Hyo On [1 ]
Ko, Won Il [1 ]
Jang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Dept Nucl Fuel Cycle Technol, 989-111 Daedeok Daero, Taejon 305353, South Korea
关键词
MCDM framework; Nuclear sustainability; Nuclear fuel cycle; Dynamic model; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; ELECTRE III; ENERGY; POWER; CRITERIA; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Our work is a first attempt to evaluate comprehensively the sustainability of future nuclear fuel cycle options in China based on dynamic system modeling combined with a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) analysis. Considering six essential indicators, we developed an MCDM framework to evaluate and rank China-specific sustainability in line with the quantitative performance of four candidate options of fuel cycle transition scenarios from the existing to advanced nuclear energy systems through 2100. Four transition scenarios identified are 1) the direct disposal of PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) spent fuel, 2) the mono-recycling of PWR spent fuel through PWR-MOX (Mixed Oxides), 3) the PWR-MOX followed by Fast Reactor (FR), and 4) the full recycling of PWR spent fuel using FR. We also further analyzed the roles of the different representatives of decision makers and their impacts on the overall ranking by applying AHP, TOPSIS, and PROMETHEE II methods from a weighting perspective. The results showed that Scenario 1 is the least sustainable and attractive fuel cycle option. Instead, Scenario 4 substantially satisfies the requirements underlying the current definition of nuclear sustainability, while remaining in line with China's closed nuclear fuel cycle policy. This strategic MCDM framework also provides flexibility to cope with the evolution and inherent uncertainties of technological development, which is conducive to identifying the trade-offs of future nuclear energy systems considered at a national level.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 233
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Scenarios of nuclear energy for countries with different options of nuclear fuel cycle: Utilization and perspective
    Velasquez, Carlos E.
    Estanislau, Fidellis B. G. L. E.
    Costa, Antonella L.
    Veloso, Maria Auxiliadora F.
    Pereira, Claubia
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 136
  • [22] Investigation of an integrated hydrogen production system based on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Comparative evaluation of hydrogen production options with a regenerative fuel cell system
    Orhan, Mehmet F.
    Babu, Binish S.
    ENERGY, 2015, 88 : 801 - 820
  • [23] China's Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Proliferation Risks
    Pandza, Jasper
    SURVIVAL, 2013, 55 (04) : 177 - 190
  • [24] Back-end of nuclear fuel cycle in China
    Chen, Jing
    Wei, Meng
    Liu, Xuegang
    Wang, Jianchen
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2012, 54 (01) : 46 - 48
  • [25] Strategic Thinking on Development of China Fast Reactor and Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycle System
    Zhang D.
    Qiao P.
    Yang Y.
    Du J.
    Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2019, 53 (10): : 1816 - 1820
  • [26] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED SOLAR COMBINED CYCLE
    Ojo, Collins O.
    Pont, Damien
    Conte, Enrico
    Carroni, Richard
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2012, VOL 6, 2012, : 261 - 270
  • [27] General performance evaluation method of integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) system
    Zhang, Zuxian
    Duan, Liqiang
    Wang, Zhen
    Ren, Yujie
    ENERGY, 2022, 240
  • [28] Feasibility of the integration of a molten carbonate fuel-cell system and an integrated gasification combined cycle
    Greppi, Paolo
    Bosio, Barbara
    Arato, Elisabetta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (20) : 8664 - 8669
  • [29] A Visual Integrated Analysis Platform for Nuclear Fuel Cycle System Based on Multilevel Flow Model
    Hidekazu Yoshikawa
    EngineeringSciences, 2005, (03) : 31 - 39
  • [30] Bicyclus: A statistical fuel cycle simulation framework for nuclear verification
    Schalz, Max
    Bormann, Lewin
    Goettsche, Malte
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 196